Towards a physics-based relationship for crack growth under different loading modes

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Lucas Amaral (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

R.C. Alderliesten (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

Rinze Benedictus (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites, TU Delft - Aerospace Structures & Materials)

Research Group
Structural Integrity & Composites
Copyright
© 2018 L. Amaral, R.C. Alderliesten, R. Benedictus
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.017
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 L. Amaral, R.C. Alderliesten, R. Benedictus
Research Group
Structural Integrity & Composites
Volume number
195
Pages (from-to)
222-241
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In an attempt to understand quasi-static delamination growth under mixed mode loading conditions from a physics-based perspective, this work first evaluated cracking in isotropic materials. The critical Strain Energy Density (SED) approach is adopted, because physically the onset of crack growth is expected to occur when the energy available near the crack tip reaches a critical value. The main hypothesis of the present paper is that the critical SED for onset of crack growth is constant for a given material, and independent of the loading mode. The relationship derived from this hypothesis therefore relates the physical onset of crack growth and the angle at which that occurs for any opening mode through the SED. To test this hypothesis, results from literature were taken and shear fracture tests on foam specimens were performed, which both were compared with the derived relationship. The excellent correlation demonstrated the validity of the physics-based relationship, which explains the observed differences between mode I and mode II fracture toughnesses and illustrates why concepts like the Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) alone are insufficient to explain the observations. The developed relationship allows to derive the mode II fracture toughness from mode I fracture toughness tests and the material's mechanical properties.

Files

1_s2.0_S0013794417309001_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 2.65 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 01-11-2018
License info not available