The effect of modified tannic acid (TA) eco-epoxy adhesives on mode I fracture toughness of bonded joints

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Mohamed Nasr Saleh (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

Nataša Z. Tomić (University of Belgrade)

Aleksandar Marinković (University of Belgrade)

S. Teixeira Freitas (TU Delft - Structural Integrity & Composites)

Research Group
Structural Integrity & Composites
Copyright
© 2021 M. Saleh, Nataša Z. Tomić, Aleksandar Marinković, S. Teixeira De Freitas
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107122
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 M. Saleh, Nataša Z. Tomić, Aleksandar Marinković, S. Teixeira De Freitas
Research Group
Structural Integrity & Composites
Volume number
96
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Two synthesized eco-epoxy components based on TA: (A) glycidyl ether and (B) glycidyl phosphate ester, are used, as a replacement for the Bisphenol A (BPA) based epoxy component, for bonding aluminum (Al) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP). Their effect on the mode I fracture toughness (GI) is evaluated by Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) testing while using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) for in-situ crack tip monitoring. Compared to the reference adhesive, an improvement of (GI) of Al (43%) and CFRP (100%) is obtained when using adhesive B. Moreover, regardless of the adherend material, a stick-slip pattern of crack growth is observed. Weak adhesion of the reference adhesive leads to an adhesive failure vs. a cohesive-adhesive failure in the case of adhesive B. On the contrary, the modification of adhesive A has an adverse effect on the GI of Al (-33%) and CFRP (-78%) as opposed to their reference counterparts.