2 Regional Variation in EU Identification in the Southern and Eastern Peripheries of Europe

Does Cohesion Policy Matter?

Book Chapter (2020)
Author(s)

Marcin Dabrowski (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy)

D. Stead (TU Delft - Spatial Planning and Strategy)

B Mashhoodi (TU Delft - Environmental Technology and Design)

Research Group
Spatial Planning and Strategy
Copyright
© 2020 M.M. Dabrowski, D. Stead, B. Mashhoodi
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1515/9788395720451-003
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 M.M. Dabrowski, D. Stead, B. Mashhoodi
Research Group
Spatial Planning and Strategy
Pages (from-to)
26-44
ISBN (print)
978-83-957204-4-4
ISBN (electronic)
978-83-957204-5-1
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

EU cohesion policy, supporting a variety of projects that support regional economic development and contribute to betterment of quality of life, can be considered as a tool that is contributing to the development of a ‘sense of community’ among the EU citizens and shaping the perceptions of the EU. By investing in projects across the European territory, the policy has a direct impact on people’s daily lives and their environment. Whether and how exactly EU cohesion policy actually affects what people think about the EU remains unclear, particularly at the regional level where the policy has the most direct and palpable effects. The chapter addresses this knowledge gap by exploring the regional variation of EU identification across the regions of southern and eastern Europe. This focus is particularly relevant given that these countries are the main beneficiaries of EU cohesion policy. At the same time, many of these countries are experiencing tumultuous political developments tilting the governmental discourse towards sceptical or even hostile positions towards European integration, which is not necessarily in line with citizens’ views on the EU. The study uses Euro-barometer surveys from 2015 to explore how opinions about EU image and attachment to EU vary across southern and eastern Europe. The analysis identifies clusters of regions with similar patterns and then tries to relate these clusters to the possible role of cohesion policy in the emergence of these regional patterns.