Data-driven ballast layer degradation identification and maintenance decision based on track geometry irregularities

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Wenbo Zhao (China Academy of Railway Sciences)

Weile Qiang (China Academy of Railway Sciences)

Fei Yang (China Academy of Railway Sciences)

G. Q. Jing (Beijing Jiaotong University)

Yunlong Guo (TU Delft - Railway Engineering)

Research Group
Railway Engineering
Copyright
© 2023 Wenbo Zhao, Weile Qiang, Fei Yang, Guoqing Jing, Y. Guo
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2023.2228802
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Wenbo Zhao, Weile Qiang, Fei Yang, Guoqing Jing, Y. Guo
Research Group
Railway Engineering
Issue number
4
Volume number
12
Pages (from-to)
581-603
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Ballast layer defects are the primary cause for rapid track geometry degradation. Detecting these defects in real-time during track inspections is urgently needed to ensure safe train operations. To achieve this, an indicator, the track degradation rate (TDR) was proposed. This rate is calculated using track geometry inspection data to locate and predict railway-line sections with ballast layer defects. The TDR is determined by the monthly standard deviation of the rail longitudinal level, which is one aspect of track geometry. The Ballast Layer Health Classification (BLHC) is designed by assessing the two successive TDRs before and after track geometry maintenance actions. The BLHC is used to categorize the conditions of the ballast layer, including normal periodic deterioration, abrupt deterioration, effective maintenance, rising deterioration, and severe deterioration. Both the TDR and BLHC were validated through field assessments of ballast layer conditions, where the two indicators were found to be effective in revealing defects. The results indicate that the TDR is sensitive to ballast layer defects, while the BLHC can quickly identify the location of these defects. Consequently, the BLHC can provide real-time guidance for ballast layer maintenance.