Who Builds (The Shed) On The Beach

Utilizing, Invading, and Resisting Activities On The Coastal Space

Student Report (2025)
Author(s)

K. Özdemir (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

J.M.K. Hanna – Mentor (TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Coordinates
30.704044, 36.884804
Graduation Date
17-04-2025
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
['AR2A011', 'Architectural History Thesis']
Programme
['Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences']
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This research explores the evolution of beach sheds as a vernacular architectural form/relation near Antalya, tracing their transformation from unofficial recreation solutions to contested spaces during the process of gentrification and environmental politics. Emerging as a response to the modern urban need for leisure, the structures mediated relations between local communities and the coastal environment. The dynamic and volatile character of the beach sheds, -an adaptive and transitive typology-, underscores them as “wild cards” that reflect broader conflicts over the shifting socio-political context, from serving touristification to resistance against coastal gentrification.
The research problematizes the anti-heritagization and reinforcing touristic gentrification through nature conservation processes that have caused their decline in time, positioning the debate over the structures within the displacement paradigm of disadvantaged communities and various species. In looking at the materiality, spatiality, and public image of the beach shed during various periods, this research situates this custom as in constant negotiation with the use(r) and the environment. Ultimately, the continuous debate of the tradition suggests that their architectural and historical value surpasses nostalgia or denigration and offers new possibilities for interpreting and advocating for a “just and equitable share” of this shoreline.

Files

License info not available