How Do Visualization Choices Affect Human Decision-Making? A Case Study in Air Traffic Control

Abstract

Air traffic control is advancing digitalization by developing advanced decision-support systems, where the way information is presented to operators plays a central role in shaping performance. However, the effects of different visual representations within these systems on human decision-making remain not fully understood. In this study, we compared two Conflict Detection and Resolution (CD&R) tools: the Highly Interactive Problem Solver (HIPS) and the Solution Space Diagram (SSD). Although both systems are grounded in the same control problem, they differ in how they represent the control constraints that define conflict conditions and feasible responses. Through a human-in-the-loop experiment under low-and high-traffic conditions, we analyzed how these differences influence decision-making. Results showed that, particularly in low-density traffic, HIPS enabled quicker responses, fewer commands, and smaller safety margins, whereas SSD, despite receiving more favorable subjective ratings, led to greater variability in actions. These findings suggest that visualization significantly impacts decision-making consistency and efficiency. However, in highly complex environments, overall effectiveness may depend more on operators' ability to shift and adapt decision-making patterns facilitated by the interface than on specific visual elements.