Enabled by Design: The Built Environment as a Tool for Human Enhancement

Master thesis (2023)

Authors

A.M. Lund Architecture and the Built Environment

Contributors

Birgit Jürgenhake Public Building and Housing Design (mentor)
F.M. van Andel Public Building and Housing Design (graduation committee member)
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment, Architecture and the Built Environment
Copyright: © 2023 Alexia Marie Lund
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

20-02-2023

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Architecture and the Built Environment

Abstract

Historically, our society has demonstrated tendencies of exclusion towards those who misfit the norms. While there may be innumerable factors that come into play in these scenarios, such tendencies of marginalization seem to hold a strong connection to aspects of the built environment. As one of the many standardized systems in our world, design and architecture follow guidelines that commonly comply with a ‘one size fits all’ approach, catering toa mainstream majority while disregarding individuals who misfit such standards. Such scenario of design disablement is commonly true for users of assistive technology, whose scope of devices are rarely considered within traditional design practices. Although such
technologies may be partially accounted for through codes and regulations regarding wheelchair access, the usability of other forms of mobility assistance - such as walkers, crutches, canes, scooters and adaptive limbs - remain absent in such guidelines. With architectural practices focusing on the needs of non-disabled bodies, the needs of mobility aid users seem to go unrecognized, leading to disadvantageous spatial conditions that restrict their capabilities. Taking that perspective into consideration, it’s possible to say that the ambulation restraints of individuals who rely on mobility aids is less about their physical capabilities and more about architecture’s lack of receptiveness towards their reliance on the
use of assistive devices. Bringing to light the complexities between the built environment and the use of mobility devices, this investigation seeks to recognize the joint influence between the demands imposed by spatial design and the ranging capacities of those who may use it. Although other minorities may also face barriers of flawed design, the primary concern to be addressed within this framework is the capability limitations imposed specifically on individuals who face reduced mobility and rely on assistive ambulation devices.