Finding a balance between meaningful and useful participation by improving information provision

Assessing the effectiveness of information provision approaches in participatory value evaluation on empowering participants to give informed input on urban climate adaptation projects

Master Thesis (2020)
Author(s)

S.J.J. Nouws (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Contributor(s)

N Doorn – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

JS Timmermans – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Policy Analysis)

N. Mouter – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Transport and Logistics)

A. Itten – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Copyright
© 2020 Sem Nouws
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sem Nouws
Graduation Date
07-08-2020
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Complex Systems Engineering and Management (CoSEM)']
Faculty
Technology, Policy and Management
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Participatory Value Evaluation (PVE) is a webtool-based participation method that is used to increase participation by others than the usual suspects. In PVE, respondents are asked to allocate a budget or points to a portfolio of projects that reflect real policy options, therewith evaluating the projects by stating their preferences. However, the provision of information in PVE on complex subjects such as urban climate adaptation still is characterized by some problems such as susceptibility by framing, misinterpretation and self-selection. In other words, information provision often does not comply with wishes and needs of participants. In this research, two information provision approaches are tested in PVE in an information manipulation experiment. From the research both quantitative as qualitative results are obtained, analysed by using a mixed methods approach. It is observed that the tested information provision approaches do not affect the choices made in PVE or participants’ feeling of empowerment. Moreover, it appears that the wishes and needs for information in PVE vary widely between participants. It is concluded that this heterogeneity should be the starting point in designing information provision. Deliberative participation and progressive disclosure of information are ways to accomplish this. It is recommended to apply these approaches in PVE in future research.

Files

License info not available
License info not available