Risk Personalization

Governing Uncertain Collective Risk Through Individual Decisions

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Shannon L. Spruit (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

MLC De Bruijne (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Wolter Pieters (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Copyright
© 2020 S. Spruit, M.L.C. de Bruijne, W. Pieters
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12208
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 S. Spruit, M.L.C. de Bruijne, W. Pieters
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Issue number
1
Volume number
12
Pages (from-to)
8-28
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Individuals are regularly made responsible for risks they wish to take: one can consent to processing of personal data, and decide what to buy based on risk information on product labels. However, both large-scale processing of personal data and aggregated product choices may carry collective risks for society. In such situations, governance arrangements implying individual responsibility are at odds with uncertain collective risks from new technologies. We, therefore, investigate the governance challenges of what we call risk personalization: a form of governance for dealing with uncertain collective risks that allocates responsibility for governing those risks to individuals. We situate risk personalization at the intersection of two trends: governance of uncertain risk, and emphasis on individual responsibility. We then analyze three cases selected based on diversity: social media, nanomaterials, and Uber. Cross-case comparison highlights issues of risk personalization pertaining to (i) the nature of the risk, (ii) governance arrangements in place, and (iii) mechanisms for allocating responsibility to individuals. We identify governance challenges in terms of (i) meaningful choice, (ii) effectiveness in mitigating risk, and (iii) collective decision making capacity. We conclude that the risk personalization lens stimulates reflection on the effectiveness and legitimacy of risk governance in light of individual agency.