Evaluation of multilevel sequentially semiseparable preconditioners on computational fluid dynamics benchmark problems using Incompressible Flow and Iterative Solver Software
Yue Qiu (TU Delft - Team Michel Verhaegen)
M. B. Van Gijzen (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)
JW van Wingerden (TU Delft - Team Michel Verhaegen, TU Delft - Team Jan-Willem van Wingerden)
M. Verhaegen (TU Delft - Team Raf Van de Plas, TU Delft - Team Michel Verhaegen)
C. Vuik (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This paper studies a new preconditioning technique for sparse systems arising from discretized partial differential equations in computational fluid dynamics problems. This preconditioning technique exploits the multilevel sequentially semiseparable (MSSS) structure of the system matrix. MSSS matrix computations give a data-sparse way to approximate the LU factorization of a sparse matrix from discretized partial differential equations in linear computational complexity with respect to the problem size. In contrast to the standard block diagonal and block upper-triangular preconditioners, we exploit the global MSSS structure of the 2×2 block system from the discretized Stokes equation and linearized Navier-Stokes equation. This avoids approximating the Schur complement explicitly, which is a big advantage over standard block preconditioners. Through numerical experiments on standard computational fluid dynamics benchmark problems in Incompressible Flow and Iterative Solver Software, we show the performance of the MSSS preconditioners. They indicate that the global MSSS preconditioner not only yields mesh size independent convergence but also gives viscosity parameter and Reynolds number independent convergence. Compared with the algebraic multigrid (AMG) method and the geometric multigrid (GMG) method for block preconditioners, the MSSS preconditioning technique is more robust than both the AMG method and GMG method, and considerably faster than the AMG method. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.