Residential satisfaction of private tenants in China's superstar cities

The case of Shenzhen, China

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Bo Li (TU Delft - Housing Systems)

Chi Jin (TU Delft - Housing Systems)

Sylvia Jansen (TU Delft - Housing Systems)

H. M.H. Van Der Heijden (TU Delft - Housing Systems)

P.J. Boelhouwer (TU Delft - Housing Systems)

Research Group
Housing Systems
Copyright
© 2021 B. Li, C. Jin, S.J.T. Jansen, H.M.H. van der Heijden, P.J. Boelhouwer
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103355
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 B. Li, C. Jin, S.J.T. Jansen, H.M.H. van der Heijden, P.J. Boelhouwer
Research Group
Housing Systems
Volume number
118
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In recent years, Chinese housing policies have been shifting from encouraging homeownership toward developing the private rented sector, especially in the superstar cities. Nevertheless, what are the target groups and characteristics of private rental housing in Chinese superstar cities, and whether the private rental housing is capable of meeting private tenants' housing needs remain unclear. This paper attempts to bridge this gap from the tenant perspective by examining the determinants of private tenants' residential satisfaction. We argue that residential satisfaction should be examined within different submarkets. By adopting the Structure of Housing Provision thesis, we identified three main sub-sectors in China's superstar cities, i.e. urban village housing, commercial rented housing, and Long-term Rented Apartment (LTRA). Based on a questionnaire survey in Shenzhen, we examined the characteristics of the three subsectors and tenants living in each sub-sector. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the residential satisfaction levels varied significantly in different sub-sectors and the determinants of residential satisfaction in each sub-sector. The results of an ANOVA showed that tenants living in commercial rented housing and LTRAs were more satisfied than those living in urban village housing. The regression results showed that the determinants of residential satisfaction vary considerably among different sub-sectors. The results of this paper can be useful not only for the landlords to improve tenants' residential satisfaction but also for policy-makers engaged in private rental market development and urban renewal.