Visual Disturbances to Avatar Foot Position Increase Step-width Variability in Immersive VR Treadmill Walking

Journal Article (2025)
Authors

A. van den Berg (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

K. L. Poggensee (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction, Erasmus MC)

David Abbink (TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

L Marchal Crespo (Erasmus MC, TU Delft - Human-Robot Interaction)

Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3570241
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Human-Robot Interaction
Volume number
33
Pages (from-to)
2123-2134
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3570241
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Gait variability, the subtle fluctuations in walking patterns, is crucial for adaptation and motor learning. While existing methods to increase gait variability often rely on force-based perturbations, these can reduce motivation. This study explored if a subtle visual feedback distortion (VFD), applied to a first-person avatar's foot position in an immersive virtual reality environment, could increase gait variability without such a drawback. Twenty healthy adults walked on a treadmill wearing a head-mounted display and motion trackers, performing a stepping task under two conditions: with and without VFD. The VFD introduced a continuously changing, noise-like offset to the displayed foot positions, designed to be minimally noticeable. We quantified gait variability through the standard deviation of step width and step length and collected self-report measures on embodiment, motivation, and simulator sickness. We found that VFD significantly increased step width variability by about 15%, indicating enhanced lateral adaptability. In contrast, step length variability remained unchanged. Participants adjusted their foot placement in the opposite direction of the visual distortion, supporting the idea that proprioceptive recalibration underpinned the observed changes. Notably, this increase in variability occurred without any significant effects on embodiment, motivation, or simulator sickness. These findings suggest that subtle VFD can enhance gait variability - potentially facilitating motor learning and adaptability - while preserving user experience and motivation. Future research should determine whether such VFD-based interventions yield lasting functional improvements and investigate their applicability in rehabilitation contexts, potentially offering a noninvasive, user-friendly approach to promoting healthy gait dynamics.