Optimal power flow formulations and their impacts on the performance of solution methods

Conference Paper (2019)
Author(s)

B. Sereeter (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

Kees Vuik (TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

C. Witteveen (TU Delft - Algorithmics)

P. Palensky (TU Delft - Intelligent Electrical Power Grids)

Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Copyright
© 2019 B. Sereeter, Cornelis Vuik, C. Witteveen, P. Palensky
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM40551.2019.8973585
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 B. Sereeter, Cornelis Vuik, C. Witteveen, P. Palensky
Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
2019-August
ISBN (electronic)
9781728119816
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this paper, we study four equivalent mathematical formulations of the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem and their impacts on the performance of solution methods. We show how four mathematical formulations of the OPF problem can be obtained by rewriting equality constraints given as the power flow problem into four equivalent mathematical equations using power balance or current balance equations in polar or Cartesian coordinates while keeping the same physical formulation. All four mathematical formulations are implemented in Matpower. In order to identify the formulation that results in the best convergence characteristics for the solution method, we apply MIPS, KNITRO, and FMINCON on various test cases using three different initial conditions. We compare all four formulations in terms of impact factors on the solution method such a number of nonzero elements in the Jacobian and Hessian matrices, a number of iterations and computational time on each iteration. The numerical results show that the performance of the OPF solution method is not only dependent upon the choice of the solution method itself, but also upon the exact mathematical formulation used to specify the OPF problem.

Files

08973585.pdf
(pdf | 0 Mb)
License info not available