How Hazards Turn Into Disasters

Perspectives of Emergency Responders

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

A. Bhattacharyya (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

N.Y. Aydin (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

M. Comes (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Transport and Logistics
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70288 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Transport and Logistics
Journal title
Risk Analysis: an international journal
Issue number
7
Volume number
46
Article number
e70288
Pages (from-to)
1-18
Downloads counter
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Natural hazards like floods, storms, or earthquakes turn into disasters if they hit vulnerable communities and societies. In policy and academia, this understanding has led to a surge of models and risk reduction policies that aim to reduce vulnerability and strengthen resilience. However, it remains unclear which vulnerabilities are the most important, and what stakeholders in different contexts prioritize. To address this gap, this article identifies critical exposure, vulnerability, and coping capacity factors, elicits their priority among emergency responders from different contexts, and analyses their perceived interdependences to understand their cascading potentials. To do that, we conducted a stakeholder survey with experienced disaster and emergency management professionals around the world. The results are used to analyze the perceived relationships between the priority factors via a fuzzy cognitive map. The professionals identified the level of preparedness, exposure to hazard, risk and crisis communication, community engagement, and disaster risk financing as the most important factors. The results show that the most catastrophic disasters are perceived to be caused by a combination of multiple factors and their interdependences. It was also found that practitioners thought that active civil protection agencies and available disaster risk financing have the greatest potential to prevent disasters.