Optimal operation of distribution networks under asymmetric renewable energy and load demand uncertainties

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Zhisheng Xiong (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Bo Zeng (University of Pittsburgh)

Peter Palensky (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Pedro P. Vergara (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2026.102289 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Intelligent Electrical Power Grids
Journal title
Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks
Volume number
46
Article number
102289
Downloads counter
13
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

To develop an optimal operational scheme for distribution networks capable of addressing asymmetric uncertainties associated with renewable energy and load demands, this paper presents a confidence level-based information gap decision theory (CL-IGDT) framework. Building on IGDT, the proposed framework utilizes the confidence level to capture the asymmetric characteristics of uncertainties and maximize the risk-averse capability of the solution in a probabilistic manner. To facilitate such probabilistic consideration, the imprecise Dirichlet model is employed to construct the ambiguity sets of uncertainties. Consequently, a two-stage robust optimal operation model for distribution networks using CL-IGDT is developed. An iterative method is proposed to solve the model and determine the upper and lower bounds of the objective function. Case study demonstrates that the proposed approach yields a more robust and statistically optimized solution with required accuracy compared to existing methods, contributing to a reduction in first-stage cost by 0.84%, second-stage average cost by 6.7%, and significantly increasing the reliability of the solution by 8%.