Integrating Qualitative Flow Observations in a Lumped Hydrologic Routing Model

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

M. Mazzoleni (Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS), Uppsala University)

Alessandro Amaranto (Piazza Leonardo da Vinci)

DP Solomatine (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Water Problems Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, TU Delft - Water Resources)

Research Group
Water Resources
Copyright
© 2019 M. Mazzoleni, A. Amaranto, D.P. Solomatine
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023768
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 M. Mazzoleni, A. Amaranto, D.P. Solomatine
Research Group
Water Resources
Issue number
7
Volume number
55
Pages (from-to)
6088-6108
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study aims at proposing novel approaches for integrating qualitative flow observations in a lumped hydrologic routing model and assessing their usefulness for improving flood estimation. Routing is based on a three-parameter Muskingum model used to propagate streamflow in five different rivers in the United States. Qualitative flow observations, synthetically generated from observed flow, are converted into fuzzy observations using flow characteristic for defining fuzzy classes. A model states updating method and a model output correction technique are implemented. An innovative application of Interacting Multiple Models, which use was previously demonstrated on tracking in ballistic missile applications, is proposed as state updating method, together with the traditional Kalman filter. The output corrector approach is based on the fuzzy error corrector, which was previously used for robots navigation. This study demonstrates the usefulness of integrating qualitative flow observations for improving flood estimation. In particular, state updating methods outperform the output correction approach in terms of average improvement of model performances, while the latter is found to be less sensitive to biased observations and to the definition of fuzzy sets used to represent qualitative observations.

Files

2018WR023768.pdf
(pdf | 2.15 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 26-01-2020
License info not available