Design considerations for ferrofluid pressure bearing pads

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

S.W.M. van den Toorn (TU Delft - Support Precision and Microsystem Engineering)

J.W. Spronck (TU Delft - Mechatronic Systems Design)

Ron A.J. van Ostayen (TU Delft - Mechatronic Systems Design)

S. G.E. Lampaert (TU Delft - Mechatronic Systems Design)

Research Group
Mechatronic Systems Design
Copyright
© 2021 S.W.M. van den Toorn, J.W. Spronck, R.A.J. van Ostayen, S.G.E. Lampaert
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100200
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 S.W.M. van den Toorn, J.W. Spronck, R.A.J. van Ostayen, S.G.E. Lampaert
Research Group
Mechatronic Systems Design
Volume number
10
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The novel contribution of this research is insight into the influence of different parameters in the magnet configurations on the load and stiffness of a ferrofluid pressure bearing. It is shown that magnets with a small cross-section magnetized alternatively up and downwards combine a high load capacity and moderate stiffness while being low on material cost and complexity. The configuration where magnets are placed alternatively in left and right direction magnetized inter spaced with iron yields the highest load capacity and stiffness, albeit at the cost of weight and complexity. It is shown that an increase in the number of magnets is beneficial for the stiffness in both magnetization configurations, as is an increase in remanent flux density of the magnet. A metal bottom plate made of iron reduces the necessary height of the magnet in the up-down magnetization configuration. The model was validated using a bearing pad arranged in the up-down configuration. The force-displacement curve of this pad was measured in a load frame, using the APG 513 ​A ferrofluid from Ferrotec. A load capacity of 1.75 ​N/cm2 was achieved, this exceeds previous pressure bearing implementations and performs comparable or better than implementations of single seal ferrofluid pocket bearings. These results show that the ferrofluid pressure bearing is a passive alternative in motion systems where the designer otherwise would have needed to use an active bearing.