Navigating uncertainty

Safety solutions for autonomous vehicle integration into mixed-mode mobility

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

G. C.H.E. de Croon (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

J. Hagenaars (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

J. Kober (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Y. H. Liu (Eindhoven University of Technology)

A. Palffy (Perciv AI)

T. Sun (Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), Maastricht University)

N. van Nes (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV))

W. P. Medendorp (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen)

S. M. Bohte (Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), Universiteit van Amsterdam)

More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Learning & Autonomous Control
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.102141 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Learning & Autonomous Control
Journal title
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume number
39
Article number
102141
Downloads counter
6
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Uncertainty fundamentally shapes human perception and decision-making, a factor that is becoming increasingly critical as autonomous vehicles (AVs) begin to share physical and social spaces with humans. This perspective paper synthesizes insights from neuroscience, robotics, and behavioral science represent uncertainty and act under it. We identify a significant disconnect between low-level mathematical concepts of uncertainty and risk, the uncertainty-aware prediction and planning methods used in robotics, and the high-level psychological uncertainty experienced by humans. Here, we conceptualize an integration pathway for mixed-mode mobility: we show that all three treat control under partial information as the same two-stage problem – probabilistic inference of the current and future state, followed by a risk -weighted choice of action – and we make this shared structure explicit. We thus argue that AVs should quantify and calibrate their own uncertainty, select risk metrics that reflect both individual and collective safety, model how their actions shape human uncertainty and behavior, and communicate intent and confidence in ways that support predictable interaction. This synthesis positions psychological uncertainty as a behaviorally relevant variable for AV design and outlines a research agenda for safer, more understandable transport systems.