The impact of a seaward port expansion on maintenance dredging in the Port of Rotterdam
S.P.J. van der Lugt (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
Alex Kirichek – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
B.C. van Prooijen – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
L.M. Keyzer – Mentor (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
S.F. Neumann – Mentor (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
The Port of Rotterdam is the dominant maritime gateway of the North Sea region and has repeatedly expanded seaward to accommodate increasing maritime, industrial, and logistical demand. Following large-scale developments such as Maasvlakte 2, the Port of Rotterdam is now assessing new spatial expansion options. One option is a direct seaward extension of Maasvlakte 2, referred to as a Seaward Port Expansion (SPE). Five design alternatives have been developed for this concept, denoted A1, A2, B1, B2, and C, representing progressively larger seaward extensions.
An important concern for the Port of Rotterdam is the potential effect that a future seaward expansion may have on fine sediment dynamics and, consequently, on maintenance dredging. The Port of Rotterdam depends on continuous dredging to maintain nautical depths in its access channels and port basins. After the construction of Maasvlakte 2, annual maintenance dredging volumes increased substantially in subsequent years. This raises the question of whether a future SPE could trigger an increase in siltation and dredging demand. The central hypothesis is that the modified coastal geometry may alter flow patterns, mobilise offshore fine sediment, increase fine sediment import through the Maasmond, and thereby increase sediment accumulation within the port.
This research addresses the following research question: How do alternative SPE designs affect maintenance dredging demand in the Port of Rotterdam through changes in hydrodynamics and fine sediment transport? To answer this question, a process-based framework is combined with numerical modelling using Delft3D-FLOW and DELWAQ. The framework tracks the response of fine sediment to the SPE designs from the offshore domain, through the Maasmond transect, and into the port basins.
The model results show that the SPE designs strengthen tidal flow contraction around the seaward expansion, increasing flow velocities and bed shear stresses near the curvature of the designs. Clay and fine silt remain largely in suspension offshore and show only limited sensitivity to these hydrodynamic changes. Coarse silt/micro floc responds more clearly, with reduced bed mass in the scour area and increased accumulation potential in adjacent low-energy zones.
At the Maasmond transect, the SPE designs do not increase fine sediment import into the port. Designs B2 and C reduce the net import of coarse silt/micro floc by 4% and 9%, respectively, mainly due to lower near-bed sediment availability caused by increased offshore retention. Consistent with this, the SPE designs do not lead to a systematic increase in fine sediment accumulation within the port. Within the applied model set-up, and excluding storm events, morphodynamic feedback, and construction-phase effects, the SPE designs are therefore not expected to increase maintenance dredging demand through changes in hydrodynamics and fine sediment transport alone.