Comparative analysis of radar sensing waveforms for communications

Abstract

A novel new waveform is compared with two other existing waveforms to create a radar network. In this radar network one primary radar transmits a waveform for sensing and communication and one or multiple radars receive these waveforms. The constraint for the radars is that all radars can build up a radar picture and situation awareness. What also means that the performance of the primary radar does not degrade. This new radar type is called cooperative hitchhiker with communications. In this radar network the main task is sensing, therefore additional communication signals are used to increase the performance of the sensing task. The advantages of parallel sensing and communications are reducing interference, dual use of the scarce electromagnetic (EM) spectrum in a congested EM environment and it is possible in a bistatic configuration to detect a bistatic scattering object.
The three waveforms which are compared are phase coded frequency modulated continuous wave (PC FMCW) linear frequency modulated – minimum shift keying (LFM-MSK) and a new waveform time delay between radar bursts (TDBRB). TDBRB is a simple but effective communication method on top of the sensing waveform and can be used with staggered waveforms. Where the first two waveforms make use of binary phase shift keying (BPSK), TDBRB uses a time modulation with the inserted time delay between two successive radar bursts. To distinguish the two radar bursts the first burst has a linear frequency modulated (LFM) upchirp and the successive burst, after the inserted time delay, has an LFM downchirp. PC FMCW and LFM-MSK data are compared with simulations and an experiment of the TDBRB waveform.
The conclusions are that PC FMCW has the highest data rate, followed by LFM-MSK, and TDBRB has the lowest data rate for line-of-sight connections. The first two make use of the information in one pulse, or FMCW chirp. This results in a lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and is therefore only suited for line-of-sight connections. With a matched filter and coherent integration of the TDBRB signals, this waveform is most suited for non-line-of-sight connections and communication over an object-of-interest at the cost of a lower bit rate. TDBRB has a similar performance for the different Swerling cases as the detection probability of a regular radar. The degradation in performance with the TDBRB waveform is only a fraction of the burst time because the time delay is added to an original radar burst. These results make TDBRB most suited for non-line-of-sight communication and for communications with a low signal-to-noise ratio.