Design for wellbeing during Covid-19

A cybernetic perspective on data feedback loops in complex socIotechnical systems

Conference Paper (2022)
Authors

Willem van der Maden (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

Derek Lomas (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

Paul Hekkert (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

Research Group
Form and Experience
Copyright
© 2022 W.L.A. van der Maden, J.D. Lomas, P.P.M. Hekkert
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.771
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 W.L.A. van der Maden, J.D. Lomas, P.P.M. Hekkert
Research Group
Form and Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.771
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has put wellbeing on the global agenda like never
before. Many businesses, organizations, and even governments have recognized
wellbeing as a formal policy goal. This paper addresses the question of how to design
complex systems to improve the wellbeing of their stakeholders. We present a case of
helping a university adopt a systematic approach to wellbeing assessment and
improvement during the COVID-19 crisis. To support the improvement of student and
staff wellbeing, we adopted a cybernetic perspective. Practically, this involved focusing
on the design of a feedback loop that used wellbeing assessments to inform
organizational actions. We argue that “off-the-shelf” assessments of wellbeing are
often insufficient for supporting a systemic response to data because they lack
context-sensitivity and actionability. While a “cybernetic perspective” may evoke a
sense of the inhuman or mechanical in the optimization of wellbeing, our case study
suggests otherwise. At least from our perspective, a society that aims to improve
wellbeing may look more like a deliberative or dialogical democracy than an
automated AI system.