Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Q. Peng (University of Hasselt, TU Delft - Numerical Analysis, Universiteit Leiden)

W.S. Gorter (Student TU Delft)

Fred J. Vermolen (University of Hasselt, TU Delft - Numerical Analysis)

Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Copyright
© 2022 Q. Peng, W.S. Gorter, F.J. Vermolen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Q. Peng, W.S. Gorter, F.J. Vermolen
Research Group
Numerical Analysis
Issue number
3
Volume number
21
Pages (from-to)
919-935
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.