A comparative analysis of adaptive reuse decision-making models and their alignment with project phases

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Fatemeh Vafaie (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Hilde Remøy (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Vincent Gruis (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Research Group
Real Estate Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-12-2025-0176 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Real Estate Management
Journal title
Property Management
Page Views
21
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose
Existing adaptive reuse decision-making models lack a comprehensive analysis of their functionality relevance across the distinct phases, as well as clear definitions of these phases and thorough exploration of their categorizations, criteria and related factors. This research defines the actual phases of adaptive reuse, examines existing decision-making models and explores how these models align with the distinct adaptive reuse phases.

Design/methodology/approach
The research employed a comparative analysis to explore the frameworks of various decision-making models, emphasizing their application and focus within the adaptive reuse of existing and heritage real estate. Primary and secondary sources were identified through a systematic snowball sampling technique. Additionally, a focus group workshop was conducted with an expert panel to distinguish, explore and define the adaptive reuse phases in practice.

Findings
The findings of this research underscore the diverse nature of decision-making models in adaptive reuse, revealing variations in categorizations, hierarchical structures and methods of evaluation, as well as limited attention to the specific case of heritage buildings and an emphasis on the initial phases of adaptive reuse. Besides, by defining the actual adaptive reuse phases in practice, it makes a connection between phases and adaptive reuse decision-making models.

Practical implications
This research helps decision-makers understand the phases and activities of adaptive reuse, identify the existing adaptive reuse decision-making models for different project contexts and their applicability to different phases and support improved decision-making throughout adaptive reuse projects.

Originality/value
This study connects adaptive reuse decision-making models to adaptive reuse phases, providing practical guidance on selecting appropriate models and highlighting the differences between heritage and non-heritage adaptive reuse.