A land-based controlled-source electromagnetic method for oil field exploration

An example from the Schoonebeek oil field

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

A.M. Schaller (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

R. Streich (Shell Global Solutions International B.V.)

Guy G. Drijkoningen (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

Oliver Ritter (VolcanoTectonics Junior Research Group)

Evert Cornelis Slob (TU Delft - Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics)

Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Copyright
© 2018 A.M. Schaller, Rita Streich, G.G. Drijkoningen, Oliver Ritter, E.C. Slob
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0022.1
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 A.M. Schaller, Rita Streich, G.G. Drijkoningen, Oliver Ritter, E.C. Slob
Research Group
Applied Geophysics and Petrophysics
Issue number
2
Volume number
83
Pages (from-to)
WB1-WB17
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) data are sensitive to the subsurface resistivity distribution, but 3D inversion results are ambiguous, and in-depth interpretation is challenging. Resolution and sensitivity analysis as well as the influence of noise on resolution have been used to quantify 3D inversion performance. Based on these numerical studies, a land-based CSEM survey was designed and carried out at the Schoonebeek oil field, the Netherlands. The acquired data were processed and subsequently inverted for the resistivity distribution. The 1D and 3D inversion of horizontal electric-field data show the reservoir at the right depth, matching well-log data without using a priori knowledge about the actual reservoir depth. We used a 1D model with fine layering as a starting model for 3D inversion. Synthetic data inversions and sensitivity tests demonstrate that resistive or conductive bodies inside the reservoir zone may be well-detectable with our limited acquisition geometry. Spatial variations in the reservoir resistivity are visible in the measured data and after inversion by assuming good knowledge of the background resistivity distribution. The reservoir resistivity and size, however, have to be interpreted with care considering the intrinsically low resolution of electromagnetic (EM) which is further reduced by manmade EM noise.