Measuring and comparing novelty for design solutions generated by young children through different design methods

Review (2016)
Author(s)

Wouter Sluis-Thiescheffer (Fontys Hogeschool)

Tilde Bekker (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Berry Eggen (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Arnold Vermeeren (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Huib De Ridder (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Research Group
Human Technology Relations
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.01.001 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Research Group
Human Technology Relations
Journal title
Design Studies
Volume number
43
Pages (from-to)
48-73
Downloads counter
187

Abstract

When involving children in the design process, it is important to understand the novelty of their design solutions. This paper reviews the applicability of an often cited novelty metric Shah et al. (2003) for the comparison of two design methods conducted with 8-10 year old children. The novelty metric is applied to data that is different for a number of parameters, such as a different design phase (exploratory instead of conceptual), size and variety. The results yielded by this novelty metric are not straightforward. This paper describes the difficulties encountered and introduces an alternative approach. The alternative approach leads to better results for any amount of data, for an exploratory phase. Additionally the paper explains how this approach increases the sensitivity for detecting differences in novelty when comparing design methods.