Carbon Nanofibre Purification
Process design, modelling and analysis of carbon nanofibre purification with acid leaching
K.H.G. van Oers (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)
T.J.H. Vlugt – Mentor (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)
P.B. Tamarona – Mentor (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)
M. Ramdin – Mentor (TU Delft - Engineering Thermodynamics)
Remco Hartkamp – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Complex Fluid Processing)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Catalytic methane pyrolysis (CMP) is a potential method to produce clean hydrogen without direct COx emissions, but is not cost-competitive with current hydrogen production techniques yet. A strategy to increase the cost-competitiveness is to purify and sell the nanocarbon by-product. This paper outlines the process design, modelling and analysis of purifying carbon nanofibre (CNF), produced by CMP, with acid leaching.
CNF produced by CMP with a Ni-SiO2 catalyst was used for this study and initially contains 4700 ppm of nickel. The baseline scenario of the designed process has a production capacity of 20,000 tonnes per year and includes acid leaching with HCl, liquid removal and post-treatment steps. The techno-economic analysis showed a Levelized Cost of Purification (LCOP) of 10.09 $/kg and a Net Present Value (NPV) of 1.48 billion $ for the baseline scenario. The process is very profitable due to the assumed high selling price of 25 $/kg. However, the conversion of nickel is only equal to 5.15 %, leaving 4460 ppm of nickel in the CNF product while the desired nickel content is below 300 ppm. The low conversion indicates that the quality of the CNF product is barely improved and that the assumed selling price is probably too high. The acid leaching kinetics are modelled using literature on acid leaching with HCl of nickel from a Ni-Al2O3 spent catalyst. Acid leaching experiments of nickel from CNF with H2SO4 showed a more positive average nickel conversion of 70.9 % so far. The leaching kinetics still have to be determined for a variety of acids and will be necessary to model the leaching more accurately.
Sensitivity analyses showed that the impact of the acid waste price on the LCOP was the largest of the economic parameters with ±2.5 $/kg variation, followed by the electricity price. The acid feed price also had a significant impact on the LCOP. The high impact of the acid waste and feed price showed a need for the implementation of an acid recycle. A Monte Carlo analysis indicated a robust process design under economic uncertainties. The mean of the LCOP was equal to 10.12 $/kg and the standard deviation was equal to 0.90 $/kg.
Two improved design cases of the baseline scenario are presented. The first includes changes to the reactor temperature, residence time, acid molarity, ratio of CNF feed to acid feed and the inclusion of an acid recycle. The conversion is improved to 61.04 % with an LCOP of 24.68 $/kg. The second design case builds upon the first and includes further changes to the residence time and ratio of CNF feed to acid feed. Furthermore, the reactor setup is changed to three reactors placed in series for the second design case. The conversion is increased to 93.95 %, leaving only 285.66 ppm of nickel in the CNF product. The LCOP is equal to 21.84 $/kg, but a total of 90 reactors are required. While the process is profitable and the nickel content in the product is below 300 ppm, questions arise whether the second improved design is practical.