Evaluating mosses on bioreceptive concrete

Effective sound absorbers?

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

M. Veeger (TU Delft - Materials and Environment)

Marc Ottelé (TU Delft - Materials and Environment)

Hendrik Marius Jonkers (TU Delft - Materials- Mechanics- Management & Design)

Research Group
Materials and Environment
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113194
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Materials and Environment
Volume number
281
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Moss-covered bioreceptive concrete is a novel green vertical structure which can be applied to a wide variety of structures due to its low structural and maintenance requirements. One of the potential benefits of using moss-covered concrete is its ability to absorb sound, the extent of which is currently unknown. Therefore, the effectiveness in attenuating (urban) noise of six moss species in different hydration states was assessed and compared to bare concrete and other vertical green structures. Results show that using moss-covered concrete increases sound absorption compared to bare concrete in nearly all situations. The best-performing mosses overall were acrocarp species, particularly P. capillare, which reached a peak sound absorption coefficient of 0.86 and an average of up to 0.48 (50–6400 Hz). Its results are also relatively constant across hydration states. On the other hand, G. pulvinata outperformed P. capillare when dry, but not when hydrated or wet. The pleurocarp species showed the lowest sound absorption. Finally, the thickness of the moss layer has a minor impact on absorption. The acrocarp moss species compare favourably to (in)direct vertical green structures using climbing plants, whereas the sound absorption of the pleurocarp species is slightly lower. However, the sound absorption of moss-covered concrete is significantly lower than that of vertical green structures using a growing substrate (Living Wall Systems), as the substrate provides the bulk of the absorption in this case. In conclusion, the moss-covered bioreceptive concrete presents a viable alternative to (in)direct green structures, although benefits are mostly limited to frequencies above 1000 Hz.