The Material Gaze

Reflective AI as a Design Practice

Doctoral Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

Vera van der Burg (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Contributor(s)

P.A. Lloyd – Promotor (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

R.S.K. Chandrasegaran – Copromotor (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Almila Akdag Salah – Copromotor (Universiteit Utrecht)

Research Group
Creative Processes
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:fb78a0d0-0eb9-46e9-b7af-d54bca8796ca Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Defense Date
17-09-2027
Awarding Institution
Industrial Design Engineering , Delft University of Technology
Research Group
Creative Processes
Page Views
156
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

As a designer, I came to artificial intelligence out of fascination: I wanted to understand how machines see, and what that might reveal about how we, as makers, do. But today in creative practice, AI is mostly used not to look closer, but to go faster, or even to automate the creative process altogether. In this thesis, I develop an alternative approach: a practice called Reflective AI, which slows the technology down and uses it not as a tool for production, but as a site for reflection. It treats often-overlooked stages of AI practice (from collecting data to training a model) as a material to be worked, the way a ceramicist works clay.

This approach is developed across five projects that range from investigating object detection models to a three-month ceramic residency. Throughout, I use machine learning as a mirror: I train models on my own subjective judgments, and then study how the models reflect my ways of seeing back to me. What emerges is a material gaze: a way of seeing that comes from the making of and with the model, and looks back on the maker. This thesis offers a way past the question of whether AI is good or bad for creativity, toward a slower, more considered relationship with it.