SWEET-DREAM

Side-Channel Weakness Evaluation and Enhanced Mitigation for DREAM-CIM

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Fouwad Jamil Mir (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Abdullah Aljuffri (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Said Hamdioui (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Mottaqiallah Taouil (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
Computer Engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1109/ETS69887.2026.11591644 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Computer Engineering
Publisher
IEEE
ISBN (electronic)
9798319517630
Event
31st IEEE European Test Symposium, ETS 2026 (2026-05-25 - 2026-05-29), Chania, Greece
Page Views
70
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Computation-in-memory (CIM) accelerators offer energy and area efficiency gains but remain vulnerable to power side-channel leakage. This paper presents a comprehensive security analysis of a pipelined digital SRAM-based CIM accelerator named DREAM-CIM. We first identify leakage mechanisms through pre-silicon modeling and gate-level simulation, and then confirm their presence on a 22 nm post-silicon prototype. Moreover, to mitigate leakage, we introduce a Globally Synchronous and Locally Asynchronous (GSLA) countermeasure approach that desynchronizes immediate-pipeline-update registers and randomizes local activity while preserving functional correctness. Security is evaluated using post-silicon power traces under standard side-channel analyses, demonstrating effective leakage suppression. The countermeasure incurs ≈ 53% area and ≈ 74% energy overhead relative to the baseline design. Compared to masking-based countermeasures, GSLA achieves a reduction of ≈ 8.9 × and ≈ 9.2 × in area and energy overhead, respectively.

Files

– Personal use only – Dutch Copyright Act (Article 25fa)
warning

File under embargo until 10-01-2027