Event-based optical flow on neuromorphic processor

ANN vs. SNN comparison based on activation sparsification

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Yingfu Xu (Stichting IMEC Nederland)

Guangzhi Tang (Maastricht University)

Amirreza Yousefzadeh (University of Twente)

Guido C.H.E.de de Croon (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Manolis Sifalakis (Stichting IMEC Nederland)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107447
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.@en
Volume number
188
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) for event-based optical flow are claimed to be computationally more efficient than their artificial neural networks (ANNs) counterparts, but a fair comparison is missing in the literature. In this work, we propose an event-based optical flow solution based on activation sparsification and a neuromorphic processor, SENECA. SENECA has an event-driven processing mechanism that can exploit the sparsity in ANN activations and SNN spikes to accelerate the inference of both types of neural networks. The ANN and the SNN for comparison have similar low activation/spike density (∼5%) thanks to our novel sparsification-aware training. In the hardware-in-loop experiments designed to deduce the average time and energy consumption, the SNN consumes 44.9ms and 927.0μJ, which are 62.5% and 75.2% of the ANN's consumption, respectively. We find that SNN's higher efficiency is attributed to its lower pixel-wise spike density (43.5% vs. 66.5%) that requires fewer memory access operations for neuron states.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 07-10-2025