Print Email Facebook Twitter Riding performance on a conventional bicycle and a pedelec in low speed exercises Title Riding performance on a conventional bicycle and a pedelec in low speed exercises: Objective and subjective evaluation of middle-aged and older persons Author Kovacsova, N. (TU Delft OLD Intelligent Vehicles & Cognitive Robotics) de Winter, J.C.F. (TU Delft OLD Intelligent Vehicles & Cognitive Robotics) Schwab, A.L. (TU Delft Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control) Christoph, M. (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV)) Twisk, D. A M (Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV)) Hagenzieker, Marjan (TU Delft Transport and Planning; Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid (SWOV)) Date 2016 Abstract This study investigated cycling performance of middle-aged (30–45 years old; n = 30) versus older (65+ years; n = 31) participants during low-speed tasks for which stabilization skills are known to be important. Additionally, participants’ self-ratings of their cycling skills and performance were assessed. Participants rode once on a conventional bicycle and once on a pedelec, in counterbalanced order. Three standardized tasks were performed: (1) low-speed cycling, (2) acceleration from a standstill, and (3) shoulder check. During Tasks 1 and 3, the mean absolute steering angle (a measure of the cyclist's steering activity) and the mean absolute roll rate (a measure of the amount of angular movement of the frame) were significantly greater for older participants than for middle-aged participants. These large lateral motions among older cyclists may indicate a difficulty to control the inherently unstable system. Comparing the conventional bicycle and the pedelec, participants reached a 16 km/h threshold speed in Task 2 sooner on the pedelec, an effect that was most pronounced among the older participants. Correlations between skills assessed with the Cycling Skill Inventory and actual measures of cycling performance were mostly not statistically significant. This indicates that self-reported motor-tactical and safety skills are not strongly predictive of measures of actual cycling performance. Our findings add to the existing knowledge on self-assessment of cycling skills, and suggest that age-related changes in psychomotor and sensory functions pose hazards for cycling safety. Subject Age differencesCyclingElectric bicycleSelf-reported skillsSteering performance To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:45eb43e0-f0a3-4635-9253-7eaadf7cbea0 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.018 Embargo date 2017-02-06 ISSN 1369-8478 Source Transportation Research. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42 (Part 1), 28-43 Bibliographical note Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2016 N. Kovacsova, J.C.F. de Winter, A.L. Schwab, M. Christoph, D. A M Twisk, Marjan Hagenzieker Files PDF 1_s2.0_S1369847816301140_main.pdf 2.19 MB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:45eb43e0-f0a3-4635-9253-7eaadf7cbea0/datastream/OBJ/view