Comparisons between beam and continuum models for modelling wheel-rail impact at a singular rail surface defect

Comparisons between beam and continuum models for modelling wheel-rail impact at a singular rail surface defect

Shen, C. (TU Delft Railway Engineering)
Deng, X. (TU Delft Railway Engineering; The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Wei, Z. (TU Delft Railway Engineering; China Academy of Railway Sciences)
Dollevoet, R.P.B.J. (TU Delft Railway Engineering)
Zoeteman, A. (ProRail)
Li, Z. (TU Delft Railway Engineering)

2021

A singular rail or wheel surface irregularity, such as a squat, insulation joint or wheel flat, can cause large wheelrail impact force. Both the magnitude and frequency content of the impact force need to be correctly modelledbecause they are closely related to the formation, deterioration and detection of such irregularities. In this paper,we compare two types of commonly used wheel-track interaction models for wheel-rail impact problems, i.e., abeam and a continuum finite element model. We first reveal the differences between the impact forces predictedby the two models due to a typical rail squat using a time-frequency analysis. Subsequently, we identify thecauses for the differences by evaluating the effects of different model assumptions, as well as different modelparameters. Results show that the impact force consists of a forced vibration peak M1 followed by free vibrationrelated oscillations with three dominant frequencies: f1 (340 Hz), f2 (890 Hz) and f3 (1120 Hz). Compared withthe continuum model, the beam model with a Hertzian contact spring overestimates the M1 peak force. Thediscrepancy can be reduced by using a Winkler bedding contact model. For the track model, the beam model iscomparable to the continuum model up to about 800 Hz, beyond which the track damping starts to deviate. As aresult, above 500 Hz, the contact forces dominate at f2 for the beam while at f3 for the continuum model. Finally,we show that the continuum model is more accurate than the beam model by comparing to field observations.The effects of stress wave propagation on the differences are also discussed.

3D solid finite element
Impact force
Rail surface defect
Timoshenko beam
Wave propagation
Wheel-rail contact

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:56f5fcb8-25dc-4d87-9ddc-a950d0c87994

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106400

0020-7403

International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 198, 1-16

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2021 C. Shen, X. Deng, Z. Wei, R.P.B.J. Dollevoet, A. Zoeteman, Z. Li