Wildcard Keyword Searchable Encryption (WKSE) has grown into a ubiquitous tool. It enables clients to search desired files with wildcard expressions. Although promising, previous schemes confront three barriers: (1) An adversary can launch a correlation attack to acquire the similarity between keywords. (2) The WKSE schemes exhibit false positives which can lead to wrong search results. (3) Existing feature extraction strategies limit the flexibility of search expressions. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Character Searchable Encryption scheme (MCSE) that overcomes the aforementioned barriers. To resist correlation attacks, we design the randomize pad model to encrypt the vector. To eradicate false positives, we apply the vector space model and complete feature extraction strategies so that a feature set uniquely identifies a keyword or expression. To enhance search flexibility, we introduce three distinct feature extraction strategies for keyword expressions, wildcard expressions, and logical expressions, enabling effective multi-character search. These strategies enable indexes to accom modate the search of diverse expressions. Finally, we prove that MCSE is indistinguishable against chosen-feature attacks and implement MCSE on two real datasets. Compared with state-of the-art schemes, the experiment results show that MCSE achieves good performance.

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is getting extreme attraction as it motivates unprecedented growth in the healthcare industry. Security breaches in IoMT can lead to threatening patients’ lives. For IoMT, existing medical remote attestation techniques (EMRATs) have limitations such as neglecting operational symptoms of compromised systems, like inconsistent medical sensor readings. Moreover, EMRATs do not enable medical-forensic-based attestation history and are inefficient for mutual attestation between a doctor network and a sensor network monitoring a patient. This mutual attestation guarantees safe remote surgeries. In this paper for IoMT, we present a novel remote attestation protocol, BDMFA (Blockchain-supported and Deep learning Medical Forensic-enabling Attestation), to overcome the limitations of EMRATs. BDMFA utilizes deep learning and Blockchain to learn from sensor readings and store attestation history. We prove that BDMFA is resilient to a higher number of attacks than that resisted by EMRATs. Moreover, we present a proof-of-concept implementation for BDMFA using SMART (Secure and Minimal Architecture for Root of Trust). We proved the practical feasibility of BDMFA by implementing it using Omnetpp equipped with Castalia. For a system with 50 patient-sensors and 25 doctor-terminals, BDMFA needed only 2.6 s to complete attestation and less communication cost than that needed for related state-of-the-art protocols by 28.4%. For larger systems, we carried comparative analysis confirming that our proposed protocol BDMFA requires less cost and is more scalable and efficient than related protocols.

Android operating system restricts access to data by enabling data control flow and permission systems to reduce the risk of information theft. Therefore, attackers are constantly looking for alternative and stealthy approaches to exfiltrate private data from a targeted device. This paper presents CovertPower, a covert channel attack that exfiltrates user data by actively inducing power consumption on Android devices. At the transmitting end, our CovertPower app modulates binary data into a timed resource workload (e.g., processor, write-on-memory), producing power consumption bursts. On the receiving end, we acquire power consumption traces via a low-cost hardware tool that can be easily concealed in USB wall-socket adapters or powerbanks. Therefore, a signal processing-based decoder analyzes such traces and retrieves the exfiltrated information. We demonstrate the feasibility of our attack with a thorough experimental evaluation on 14 mobile devices and various real-world settings such as display state, ongoing activities, and charging technologies. Our attack achieves a transfer speed of up to 10bps with a high bit sequence similarity on most devices and settings considered.

Over the past three decades, standardizing organizations (e.g., the National Institute of Standards and Technology and Internet Engineering Task Force) have investigated the efficiency of cryptographic algorithms and provided (technical) guidelines for practitioners. For example, the (Datagram) Transport Layer Security “(D)TLS” 1.2/1.3 was designed to help industries implement and integrate such methods through underpinning infrastructures of Internet of Everything (IoE) environments with efficiency and efficacy in mind. The main goal underpinning such protocols is to protect the Internet connections between IoE machines from malicious activities such as unauthorized eavesdropping, monitoring, and tampering with messages. In theory, these protocols are supposed to be secure. Still, most existing implementations partially follow the standard features of (D)TLS 1.2/3, leaving them vulnerable to risks such as side-channel and network attacks. In this paper, we critically review the standard protocols deployed for the security management of data and connected machines, and also examine the recently discovered vulnerabilities that lead to successful zero-day attacks in IoE environments. Then, we discuss various potential countermeasures in the form of organizational policy enforcement strategies and mitigation approaches that can be used by cybersecurity practitioners, decision- and policy-makers. Finally, we identify both proactive and reactive solutions for further consideration and study, as well as propose alternative mechanisms and e-governance policies for standardizing organizations and engineers in future solution designs.

Leader-based BFT systems face potential disruption and performance degradation from malicious leaders, with current solutions often lacking scalability or greatly increasing complexity. In this paper, we introduce ABSE, an Adaptive Baseline Score-based Election approach to mitigate the negative impact of malicious leaders on leader-based BFT systems. ABSE is fully localized and proposes to accumulate scores for processes based on their contribution to consensus advancement, aiming to bypass less reliable participants when electing leaders. We present a formal treatment of ABSE, addressing the primary design and implementation challenges, defining its generic components and rules for adherence to ensure global consistency. We also apply ABSE to two different BFT protocols, demonstrating its scalability and negligible impact on protocol complexity. Finally, by building a system prototype and conducting experiments on it, we demonstrate that ABSE-enhanced protocols can effectively minimize the disruptions caused by malicious leaders, whilst incurring minimal additional resource overhead and maintaining base performance.

Decentralised learning has recently gained traction as an alternative to federated learning in which both data and coordination are distributed over its users. To preserve the confidentiality of users' data, decentralised learning relies on differential privacy, multi-party computation, or a combination thereof. However, running multiple privacy-preserving summations in sequence may allow adversaries to perform reconstruction attacks. Unfortunately, current reconstruction countermeasures either cannot trivially be adapted to the distributed setting, or add excessive amounts of noise.

In this work, we first show that passive honest-but-curious adversaries can infer other users' private data after several privacy-preserving summations. For example, in subgraphs with 18 users, we show that only three passive honest-but-curious adversaries succeed at reconstructing private data 11.0% of the time, requiring an average of 8.8 summations per adversary. The success rate depends only on the adversaries' direct neighbourhood, and is independent of the size of the full network. We consider weak adversaries that do not control the graph topology, cannot exploit the inner workings of the summation protocol, and do not have auxiliary knowledge; and show that these adversaries can still infer private data.

We develop a mathematical understanding of how reconstruction relates to topology and propose the first topology-based decentralised defence against reconstruction attacks. Specifically, we show that reconstruction requires a number of adversaries linear in the length of the network's shortest cycle. Consequently, exact reconstruction attacks over privacy-preserving summations are impossible in acyclic networks.

Our work is a stepping stone for a formal theory of topology-based decentralised reconstruction defences. Such a theory would generalise our countermeasure beyond summation, define confidentiality in terms of entropy, and describe the interactions with (topology-aware) differential privacy.

Federated Learning is an approach that enables multiple devices to collectively train a shared model without sharing raw data, thereby preserving data privacy. However, federated learning systems are vulnerable to data-poisoning attacks during the training and updating stages. Three data-poisoning attacks-label flipping, feature poisoning, and VagueGAN-are tested on FL models across one out of ten clients using the CIC and UNSW datasets. For label flipping, we randomly modify labels of benign data; for feature poisoning, we alter highly influential features identified by the Random Forest technique; and for VagueGAN, we generate adversarial examples using Generative Adversarial Networks. Adversarial samples constitute a small portion of each dataset. In this study, we vary the percentages by which adversaries can modify datasets to observe their impact on the Client and Server sides. Experimental findings indicate that label flipping and VagueGAN attacks do not significantly affect server accuracy, as they are easily detectable by the Server. In contrast, feature poisoning attacks subtly undermine model performance while maintaining high accuracy and attack success rates, highlighting their subtlety and effectiveness. Therefore, feature poisoning attacks manipulate the server without causing a significant decrease in model accuracy, underscoring the vulnerability of federated learning systems to such sophisticated attacks. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, we explore a recent defensive approach known as Random Deep Feature Selection, which randomizes server features with varying sizes (e.g., 50 and 400) during training. This strategy has proven highly effective in minimizing the impact of such attacks, particularly on feature poisoning.

The performance of distributed averaging depends heavily on the underlying topology. In various fields, including compressed sensing, multi-party computation, and abstract graph theory, graphs may be expected to be free of short cycles, i.e. to have high girth. Though extensive analyses and heuristics exist for optimising the performance of distributed averaging in general networks, these studies do not consider girth. As such, it is not clear what happens to convergence time when a graph is stretched to a higher girth.

In this work, we introduce the optimal graph stretching problem, wherein we are interested in finding the set of edges for a particular graph that ensures optimal convergence time under constraint of a minimal girth. We compare various methods for choosing which edges to remove, and use various convergence heuristics to speed up the searching process. We generate many graphs with varying parameters, stretch and optimise them, and measure the duration of distributed averaging. We find that stretching by itself significantly increases convergence time. This decrease can be counteracted with a subsequent repair phase, guided by a convergence time heuristic. Existing heuristics are capable, but may be suboptimal.

Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) infer whether a data point is in the training data of a machine learning model, posing privacy risks to sensitive data like medical records or financial data. Intuitively, data points that MIA accurately detects are vulnerable. Those data points may exist in the data of different target models, each susceptible to multiple MIAs. As such, the vulnerability of data points under multiple MIAs and target models represents a significant challenge. This article defines several metrics reflecting data points’ vulnerability and capturing vulnerable data points under multiple MIAs and target models. We implement 77 MIAs, with an average attack accuracy over target models ranging from 0.5 to 0.9, to support our analysis with our scalable and flexible platform, Various Membership Inference Attacks Platform (VMIAP). Based on the results, we observe that MIA has an inference tendency to some data points despite a low overall inference performance. Furthermore, previous approaches are unsuitable for finding vulnerable data points under multiple MIAs and target models. Finally, we explore the impact of retraining target, shadow, and attack models separately on the vulnerability of data points.

Private set intersection protocols allow two parties with private sets of data to compute the intersection between them without leaking other information about their sets. These protocols have been studied for almost 20 years, and have been significantly improved over time, reducing both their computation and communication costs. However, when more than two parties want to compute a private set intersection, these protocols are no longer applicable. While extensions exist to the multi-party case, these protocols are significantly less efficient than the two-party case. It remains an open question to design collusion-resistant multi-party private set intersection (MPSI) protocols that come close to the efficiency of two-party protocols. This work is made more difficult by the immense variety in the proposed schemes and the lack of systematization. Moreover, each new work only considers a small subset of previously proposed protocols, leaving out important developments from older works. Finally, MPSI protocols rely on many possible constructions and building blocks that have not been summarized. This work aims to point protocol designers to gaps in research and promising directions, pointing out common security flaws and sketching a frame of reference. To this end, we focus on the semi-honest model. We conclude that current MPSI protocols are not a one-size-fits-all solution, and instead there exist many protocols that each prevail in their own application setting.

Autonomous driving is a research direction that has gained enormous traction in the last few years thanks to advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Depending on the level of independence from the human driver, several studies show that Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) can reduce the number of on-road crashes and decrease overall fuel emissions by improving efficiency. However, security research on this topic is mixed and presents some gaps. On one hand, these studies often neglect the intrinsic vulnerabilities of AI algorithms, which are known to compromise the security of these systems. On the other, the most prevalent attacks towards AI rely on unrealistic assumptions, such as access to the model parameters or the training dataset. As such, it is unclear if autonomous driving can still claim several advantages over human driving in real-world applications. This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AV sand establishing a pragmatic threat model. Through our analysis, we develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios. Our evaluation serves as a foundation for providing essential takeaway messages, guiding both researchers and practitioners at various stages of the automation pipeline. In doing so, we contribute valuable insights to advance the discourse on the security and viability of autonomous driving in real-world applications.

In the Internet of Things era, the Internet demands extremely high-speed communication and data transformation. To this end, the tactile Internet has been proposed as a medium that provides the sense of touch ability, facilitating data transferability with extra-low latency in various applications ranging from industry, robotics, and healthcare to road traffic, education, and culture. Here, programmable networks are role players in approaching the tactile Internet's low latency (≈ 1ms) pillar. Several functionalities - including security - are offloaded onto the network core employing programmable in-network pipelines. From the security perspective, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is another role player that enables the line-rate inference on the core network without involving the control plane. However, integrating AI-based security solutions in programmable devices is challenging mainly because of their constrained anatomy. Furthermore, such solutions inherit well-known adversarial AI vulnerabilities, representing an additional threat to programmable networks. Considering the above, this article discusses AI-based security solutions in programmable networks, focusing on the explored modalities of integrating AI models in programmable constrained network devices. Moreover, we elaborate on the challenges and risks of relying on AI for such mechanisms. Lastly, the article brings a visionary glimpse for future trends in this regard, raising some essential questions on the indispensability of AI for security functionalities and providing some alternative solutions.

Lawful evidence management by law enforcement agencies during the Digital Forensics (DF) investigation is of supreme importance since it convicts suspects of crimes. Therefore, a secure and efficient evidence management system should have certain features such as tamper-resistant, traceability, auditability, privacy preservation, and fine-grained access control. Unfortunately, the state-of-the-art DF is facing new challenges due to the recent technological advancements in various areas, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), communication technologies, and cloud computing, which are heavily being used in our daily lives. These technologies are also the primary sources for evidence extraction in most crimes. Hence, forensic experts need novel tools and methodologies to keep pace with these new technologies. The inherent properties of blockchain, such as transparency, immutability, secure anonymity, and auditability, make it a suitable solution to address DF’s new challenges. To this end, we provide a compact survey on state-of-the-art blockchain-based DF investigation techniques along with their advantages and disadvantages. We will discuss all critical issues and challenges involved in forensic investigations and evidence management systems, focusing on security and privacy challenges. Moreover, blockchain-based solutions that target specific service areas such as IoT and cloud computing forensics will be discussed in detail due to their usage in many application domains. Finally, we will present the challenges that existing blockchain-based forensics solutions face, along with possible ways of addressing them.

Hyperloop is among the most prominent future transportation systems. It involves novel technologies to allow traveling at a maximum speed of 1220km/h while guaranteeing sustainability. Due to the system's performance requirements and the critical infrastructure it represents, its safety and security must be carefully considered. In transportation systems, cyberattacks could lead to safety issues with catastrophic consequences for the population and the surrounding environment. To this day, no research inves-tigated the cybersecurity issues of the Hyperloop technology. In this paper, we provide the first analysis of the cybersecurity challenges of the interconnections between the different components of the Hyperloop ecosystem. We base our analysis on the currently available Hyperloop implementations, distilling those features that will likely be present in its final design. Moreover, we investigate possible infrastructure management approaches and their security concerns. Finally, we discuss countermeasures and future directions for the security of the Hyperloop design.

Digital forensics is crucial to fight crimes around the world. Decentralized Digital Forensics (DDF) promotes it to another level by channeling the power of blockchain into digital investigations. In this work, we focus on the privacy and security of DDF. Our motivations arise from (1) how to track an anonymous- and-malicious data user who leaks only a part of the previously requested data, (2) how to achieve access control while protecting data from untrusted data centers, and (3) how to enable efficient and secure search on the blockchain. To address these issues, we propose Themis: an anonymous and secure DDF scheme with traceable anonymity, private access control, and efficient search. Our framework is boosted by establishing a Trusted Execution Environment in each authority (blockchain node) for securing the uploading, requesting, and searching. To instantiate the framework, we design a secure and robust watermarking scheme in conjunction with decentralized anonymous authentication, a private and fine-grained access control scheme, and an efficient and secure search scheme based on a dynamically updated data structure. We formally define and prove the privacy and security of Themis. We build a prototype with Ethereum and Intel SGX2 to evaluate its performance, which supports processing data from a considerable number of data providers and investigators.

The Internet of Things rapid growth poses privacy and security challenges for the traditional key storage methods. Physical Unclonable Functions offer a potential solution but require secure fuzzy extractors to ensure reliable replication. This paper introduces X-Lock, a novel and secure computational fuzzy extractor that addresses the limitations faced by traditional solutions in resource-constrained IoT devices. X-Lock offers a reusable and robust solution, effectively mitigating the impacts of bias and correlation through its design. Leveraging the preferred state of a noisy source, X-Lock encrypts a random string of bits that can be later used as seed to generate multiple secret keys. To prove our claims, we provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis, addressing security considerations, and implement the proposed model. To evaluate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposal, we also provide practical experiments and compare the results with existing approaches. The experimental findings demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm, showing comparable memory cost (≈2.4 KB for storing 5 keys of 128 bits) while being 3 orders of magnitude faster with respect to the state-of-the-art solution (0.086 ms against 15.51 s).

Speaker identification (SI) determines a speaker's identity based on their utterances. Previous work indicates that SI deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks that embed a backdoor functionality in a DNN causing incorrect outputs during inference when a trigger is provided. This is the first work exploring SI DNNs' vulnerability to backdoor attacks using speakers' emotional prosody, resulting in dynamic, inconspicuous triggers. We used three datasets and three DNN architectures to determine the impact of using emotions as backdoor triggers on the accuracy of SI DNNs. Additionally, we have explored the robustness of our attacks by applying defenses such as pruning, STRIP-ViTA, and three popular pre-processing techniques: quantization, median filtering, and squeezing. We show that the aforementioned models are prone to our attack (EmoBack), indicating that emotional triggers (i.e., the most effective being neutral, sad, angry, and surprised prosody) can be effectively used to compromise the integrity of SI DNNs. However, our pruning experiments suggest potential ways to reinforce backdoored models against our attacks across multiple emotions, decreasing the attack success rate up to 41.4%.

Given today's ongoing deployment of deep learning models, ensuring their security against adversarial attacks has become paramount. This paper introduces an enhanced version of the PhantomSponges attack by Shapira et al. The attack exploits the non-maximum suppression (NMS) algorithm in YOLO object detection (OD) models without compromising OD, substantially increasing inference time. Our enhancement focuses on improving the attack's impact on YOLOv5 models by modifying its bounding box area loss term, aiming to directly decrease the intersection over union and, thus, exacerbate the computational load on NMS. Through a parameter study using the Berkeley Deep Drive dataset, we evaluate the enhanced attack's efficacy against various sizes of YOLOv5, demonstrating, under certain circumstances, an improved capability to increase NMS time with a minimal loss in OD accuracy. Furthermore, we propose a novel defense that dynamically resizes input images to mitigate the attack's effectiveness, showcasing a substantial restoration in inference speed and OD accuracy. Our findings show that the enhanced attack could result in a 550% increase in NMS time on the YOLOv5 small configuration. Moreover, our defense's results show a substantial decrease of 90.18% in NMS execution time when applied to an attacked YOLOv5 large model.

We consider the problem of publicly verifiable privacy-preserving data aggregation in the presence of a malicious aggregator colluding with malicious users. State-of-the-art solutions either split the aggregator into two parties under the assumption that they do not collude, or require many rounds of interactivity and have non-constant verification time. In this work, we propose mPVAS, the first publicly verifiable privacy-preserving data aggregation protocol that allows arbitrary collusion, without relying on trusted third parties during execution, where verification runs in constant time. We also show three extensions to mPVAS: mPVAS+, for improved communication complexity, mPVAS-IV, for the identification of malicious users, and mPVAS-UD, for graceful handling of reduced user availability without the need to redo the setup. We show that our schemes achieve the desired confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity. Finally, through both theoretical and experimental evaluations, we show that our schemes are feasible for real-world applications.

Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence, and particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), offer promising prospects for aiding system administrators in managing the complexity of modern networks. However, despite this potential, a significant gap exists in the literature regarding the extent to which LLMs can understand computer networks. Without empirical evidence, system administrators might rely on these models without assurance of their efficacy in performing network-related tasks accurately. In this paper, we are the first to conduct an exhaustive study on LLMs' comprehension of computer networks. We formulate several research questions to determine whether LLMs can provide correct answers when supplied with a network topology and questions on it. To assess them, we developed a thorough framework for evaluating LLMs' capabilities in various network-related tasks. We evaluate our framework on multiple computer networks employing proprietary (e.g., GPT4) and open-source (e.g., Llama2) models. Our findings in general purpose LLMs using a zero-shot scenario demonstrate promising results, with the best model achieving an average accuracy of 79.3%. Proprietary LLMs achieve noteworthy results in small and medium networks, while challenges persist in comprehending complex network topologies, particularly for open-source models. Moreover, we provide insight into how prompt engineering can enhance the accuracy of some tasks.