A.M.C. Versteeg
Please Note
9 records found
1
TU Delft Open Science Programme 2024-2028 Research and Education in the Open Era
Evaluation 2025 & Work Plan 2026
TU Delft Open Science Programme 2024-2028 Research and Education in the Open Era
Evaluation 2024 & Work plan 2025
TU Delft Open Science Programme 2020-2024 Research and Education in the Open Era
Evaluation 2022 & Work plan 2023
The current OSP assumes that three cross-cutting themes provide the glue that binds the seven projects together.
Additionally, the projects have, in some cases, more substantial dependencies with activities and projects outside than inside the OSP. That observation may call for a radically different setup and even question whether a follow-up OSP is the right approach. However, several national developments make such a follow-up perfect sense:
• establishing a council of Chiefs-of-Open-Science;
• transitioning from NPOS to NWO ‘regie-orgaan’;
• an increased prospect of government funding for open science and open education.
It is in the strategic interest of TU Delft to have a balanced, effective, and well-communicated set of activities that advance open science at its faculties. To emphasise that this is not a new effort, we suggest calling this programme Open Science NEXT.
We’ll still create actively links between the various projects in the OSP. However, we can also find such links at each of our faculties. In their work, they need to apply the principles of open science in all dimensions of education and research. In the last year of the Open Science Programme, we will investigate more than before how to reach out to local research and teaching programmes.
In the last year we learned that some of our most dedicated open science colleagues are slowed down in their best practices by the investments in infrastructure that TU Delft made in the past. Also open science efforts are not always recognised in TU Delft evaluation processes for hiring, tenure and promotion.
The main goals for this year and beyond are:
• To emphasise explicitly that ‘open’ becomes the new ‘normal’;
• To acknowledge that there are internal obstacles that we need to resolve;
• To embrace a policy that all future investments and purchases of software and systems facilitate seamless open teaching and research practices. ...
The current OSP assumes that three cross-cutting themes provide the glue that binds the seven projects together.
Additionally, the projects have, in some cases, more substantial dependencies with activities and projects outside than inside the OSP. That observation may call for a radically different setup and even question whether a follow-up OSP is the right approach. However, several national developments make such a follow-up perfect sense:
• establishing a council of Chiefs-of-Open-Science;
• transitioning from NPOS to NWO ‘regie-orgaan’;
• an increased prospect of government funding for open science and open education.
It is in the strategic interest of TU Delft to have a balanced, effective, and well-communicated set of activities that advance open science at its faculties. To emphasise that this is not a new effort, we suggest calling this programme Open Science NEXT.
We’ll still create actively links between the various projects in the OSP. However, we can also find such links at each of our faculties. In their work, they need to apply the principles of open science in all dimensions of education and research. In the last year of the Open Science Programme, we will investigate more than before how to reach out to local research and teaching programmes.
In the last year we learned that some of our most dedicated open science colleagues are slowed down in their best practices by the investments in infrastructure that TU Delft made in the past. Also open science efforts are not always recognised in TU Delft evaluation processes for hiring, tenure and promotion.
The main goals for this year and beyond are:
• To emphasise explicitly that ‘open’ becomes the new ‘normal’;
• To acknowledge that there are internal obstacles that we need to resolve;
• To embrace a policy that all future investments and purchases of software and systems facilitate seamless open teaching and research practices.
TU Delft Strategic Plan Open Science 2020-2024 Research and Education in the Open Era
Evaluation 2020 & Work plan 2021
TU Delft Open Science Programme 2020-2024 Research and Education in the Open Era
Evaluation 2021 & Work plan 2022
Policy needs to go hand in hand with practice
The learning and listening approach to data management
In this paper, we explain our strategy for developing research data management policies at TU Delft. Policies can be important drivers for research institutions in the implementation of good data management practices. As Rans and Jones note (Rans and Jones 2013), " Policies provide clarity of purpose and may help in the framing of roles, responsibilities and requisite actions. They also legitimise making the case for investment”. However, policy development often tends to place the researchers in a passive position, while they are the ones managing research data on a daily basis. Therefore, at TU Delft, we have taken an alternative approach: a policy needs to go hand in hand with practice. The policy development was initiated by the Research Data Services at TU Delft Library, but as the process continued, other stakeholders, such as legal and IT departments, got involved. Finally, the faculty-based Data Stewards have played a key role in leading the consultations with the research community that led to the development of the faculty-specific policies. This allows for disciplinary differences to be reflected in the policies and to create a closer connection between policies and day-to-day research practice. Our primary intention was to keep researchers and research practices at the centre of our strategy for data management. We did not want to introduce and mandate requirements before adequate infrastructure and professional support were available to our research community and before our researchers were themselves willing to discuss formalisation of data management practices. This paper describes the key steps taken and the most important decisions made during the development of RDM policies at TU Delft.