P.A. van Dorp
Please Note
2 records found
1
Estimating long-term annual energy production from shorter-time-series data
Methods and verification with a 10-year large-eddy simulation of a large offshore wind farm
Models used in wind resource assessment (WRA) range from engineering wake models and computational fluid dynamics models to mesoscale weather models with wind farm parameterizations and, more recently, large-eddy simulation (LES). The latter two produce time series of wind farm power of a certain period. This simulation period is, in the case of LES, mostly limited to ≤ 1 year due to the computational costs. However, estimates of long-term (O(10 years)) power production are of high value to many parties involved in WRA. To address the need to calculate long-term annual energy production from ≤ 1-year model runs, therefore, this paper presents methods to estimate the long-term (O(10 years)) power production of a wind farm using a ≤ 1-year simulation. To validate the methods, a 10-year LES of a hypothetical large offshore wind farm is performed. The methods work by estimating the conditional probability densities between wind farm power from the LES and wind speed from reanalysis data (ERA5) from a short (≤ 1 year) LES run. The conditional probability densities are then integrated over 10 years of ERA5 wind speed, yielding an estimate of the long-term mean power production. This "long-term correction"method is validated on varying simulation periods, selected with four different day-selection techniques. When applied to a simulation period of 365 consecutive days, the methods can estimate the 10-year mean power production with a mean absolute error of around 0.35 % of the long-term mean. When choosing the simulation period with day-selection techniques that represent the long-term climate, only roughly 200 simulation days are needed to achieve the same accuracy. Finally, a method to also include wind observations in the long-term correction is presented and tested. This requires an additional "free stream"LES run without active turbines and gives estimates of long-term power and wind that are corrected for a potential LES bias. Although validation of this final approach is difficult in the employed modeling strategy, it gives valuable insights and fits within the common WRA practice of combining models and observations. The presented techniques are based on physical arguments, computationally cheap, and simple to implement. Furthermore, they are not limited to LES but can be applied to other time-series-based models. As such, they could be a useful extension for the diverse set of modeling, observational, and statistical techniques used in WRA.
Accurate short-term power forecasts are crucial for the reliable and efficient integration of wind energy in power systems and electricity markets. Typically, forecasts for hours to days ahead are based on the output of numerical weather prediction models, and with the advance of computing power, the spatial and temporal resolutions of these models have increased substantially. However, high-resolution forecasts often exhibit spatial and/or temporal displacement errors, and when regarding typical average performance metrics, they often perform worse than smoother forecasts from lower-resolution models. Recent computational advances have enabled the use of large-eddy simulations (LESs) in the context of operational weather forecasting, yielding turbulence-resolving weather forecasts with a spatial resolution of 100 m or finer and a temporal resolution of 30 seconds or less. This paper is a proof-of-concept study on the prospect of leveraging these ultra high-resolution weather models for operational forecasting at Horns Rev I in Denmark. It is shown that temporal smoothing of the forecasts clearly improves their skill, even for the benchmark resolution forecast, although potentially valuable high-frequency information is lost. Therefore, a statistical post-processing approach is explored on the basis of smoothing and feature engineering from the high-frequency signal. The results indicate that for wind farm forecasting, using information content from both the standard and LES resolution models improves the forecast accuracy, especially with a feature selection stage, compared with using the information content solely from either source.