<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
Abstract(2024)
-
Peter Voss, Tom Kettlety, Evgeniia Martuganova, Daniela Kühn, Susann Wienecke, Johannes Schweitzer, Cornelis Weemstra, Brian Baptie, Trine Dahl-Jensen, More Authors...
This presentation gives an overview of the ACT3 SHARP Storage project (Stress history and reservoir pressure for improved quantification of CO2 storage containment risks), introducing its ongoing seismological activities. This includes building a new earthquake catalogue for the North Sea area and designing improved seismic monitoring schemes for CO2 storage sites using seismic networks, seismic arrays, and distributed acoustic sensing on fibre-optic cables. The SHARP Storage project was launched in late 2021 with the overall aim to increase accuracy of subsurface CO2 storage containment risk management through the improvement and integration of subsurface stress models, rock mechanical failure and seismicity observations. SHARP is collaboration between 16 research institutions and companies and is supported under the ACT3 call. ACT is an ERA NET Cofund, which is a tool established by the European Commission under the Horizon 2020 programme for research and innovation. More information on the SHARP Storage project is found at https://sharp-storage-act.eu/.
...
This presentation gives an overview of the ACT3 SHARP Storage project (Stress history and reservoir pressure for improved quantification of CO2 storage containment risks), introducing its ongoing seismological activities. This includes building a new earthquake catalogue for the North Sea area and designing improved seismic monitoring schemes for CO2 storage sites using seismic networks, seismic arrays, and distributed acoustic sensing on fibre-optic cables. The SHARP Storage project was launched in late 2021 with the overall aim to increase accuracy of subsurface CO2 storage containment risk management through the improvement and integration of subsurface stress models, rock mechanical failure and seismicity observations. SHARP is collaboration between 16 research institutions and companies and is supported under the ACT3 call. ACT is an ERA NET Cofund, which is a tool established by the European Commission under the Horizon 2020 programme for research and innovation. More information on the SHARP Storage project is found at https://sharp-storage-act.eu/.
Abstract(2024)
-
Tom Kettlety, Peter Voss, Daniela Kühn, Evgeniia Martuganova, Johannes Schweitzer, Trine Dahl-Jensen, Annie Jerkins, Elin Skurtveit
To effectively design and operate the many CO2 storage projects that are being developed in the North Sea, seismicity needs to be accurately characterised. Measuring seismicity can provide insights into the stress state in the region, fault density and faulting style, as well as fracturing in the overburden. Understanding background seismicity rates is also key to discriminating, determining the risk of, and mitigation against induced seismicity that could result from injection. Communicating earthquake risk is a key challenge in this field, and central to that is the reporting of earthquake sizes or magnitudes. These magnitudes are reported to the public, and thus their integrity needs to be ensured and their uncertainties thoroughly characterised. Magnitudes also are key input into seismic hazard analysis, a necessary step in the site characterisation of CO2 storage projects and other offshore infrastructure. This study compares and re-evaluates the magnitude estimates from a large database of North Sea seismicity compiled by the ACT3 project SHARP Storage. Magnitudes and their associated uncertainties are computed in a consistent manner and compared to the recordings reported by the regional agencies. Systematic differences are explored, and key sensitives are identified. These results will aid in the monitoring of seismicity in the North Sea, risk assessment for CO2 storage and other infrastructure, and the communication of seismic hazard.
...
To effectively design and operate the many CO2 storage projects that are being developed in the North Sea, seismicity needs to be accurately characterised. Measuring seismicity can provide insights into the stress state in the region, fault density and faulting style, as well as fracturing in the overburden. Understanding background seismicity rates is also key to discriminating, determining the risk of, and mitigation against induced seismicity that could result from injection. Communicating earthquake risk is a key challenge in this field, and central to that is the reporting of earthquake sizes or magnitudes. These magnitudes are reported to the public, and thus their integrity needs to be ensured and their uncertainties thoroughly characterised. Magnitudes also are key input into seismic hazard analysis, a necessary step in the site characterisation of CO2 storage projects and other offshore infrastructure. This study compares and re-evaluates the magnitude estimates from a large database of North Sea seismicity compiled by the ACT3 project SHARP Storage. Magnitudes and their associated uncertainties are computed in a consistent manner and compared to the recordings reported by the regional agencies. Systematic differences are explored, and key sensitives are identified. These results will aid in the monitoring of seismicity in the North Sea, risk assessment for CO2 storage and other infrastructure, and the communication of seismic hazard.
Journal article(2024)
-
Tom Kettlety, Evgeniia Martuganova, Elin Skurtveit, Daniela Kühn, Johannes Schweitzer, Cornelis Weemstra, Brian Baptie, Trine Dahl-Jensen, Annie Jerkins, Peter H. Voss, J. Michael Kendall
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is essential to European decarbonisation efforts, and several offshore CO2 storage projects are being developed in the North Sea. Understanding the geomechanical response to CO2 injection is key to both the pre-characterisation and operation of a storage reservoir. A thorough assessment of seismicity gives critical insights into the stress field and faulting around reservoirs, both key controls on the geomechanical response to injection. Seismicity also illuminates potential hydraulic pathways for leakage, be it directly by revealing the extent of faults, or indirectly through fractures imaged by measurements of seismic anisotropy. High quality seismicity data is critical to underpin all of these methods of analysis. This paper presents the most complete catalogue of seismicity in the North Sea to date. The combined data are enabling revised assessments of seismic hazard and leakage risk in the North Sea, as well as a better understanding of faulting and stress. This study shows the value of unifying disparate seismicity data, allowing for more accurate seismological analyses. These lay the foundation for better management of risks for not only geologic CO2 storage, but other offshore industries and infrastructure.
...
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is essential to European decarbonisation efforts, and several offshore CO2 storage projects are being developed in the North Sea. Understanding the geomechanical response to CO2 injection is key to both the pre-characterisation and operation of a storage reservoir. A thorough assessment of seismicity gives critical insights into the stress field and faulting around reservoirs, both key controls on the geomechanical response to injection. Seismicity also illuminates potential hydraulic pathways for leakage, be it directly by revealing the extent of faults, or indirectly through fractures imaged by measurements of seismic anisotropy. High quality seismicity data is critical to underpin all of these methods of analysis. This paper presents the most complete catalogue of seismicity in the North Sea to date. The combined data are enabling revised assessments of seismic hazard and leakage risk in the North Sea, as well as a better understanding of faulting and stress. This study shows the value of unifying disparate seismicity data, allowing for more accurate seismological analyses. These lay the foundation for better management of risks for not only geologic CO2 storage, but other offshore industries and infrastructure.