HL
H. Lopez
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
3 records found
1
The TU Delft Strategic Planning Cycle is a comprehensive strategic planning model designed to enhance urban sustainability and inclusivity by incorporating a range of participatory tools and methodologies that facilitate broad stakeholder engagement through a detailed step-by-step planning cycle.
The TU Delft Strategic Planning Cycle is rooted in the Dutch tradition of democratic visioning and strategic planning, which emphasises the integration of policy and design alongside a strong participatory ethos. This tradition is central to the planning education offered at TU Delft, where students and professionals are trained to approach urban planning with a integrative perspective that combines technical expertise with a deep commitment to democratic processes and sustainable outcomes. ...
The TU Delft Strategic Planning Cycle is rooted in the Dutch tradition of democratic visioning and strategic planning, which emphasises the integration of policy and design alongside a strong participatory ethos. This tradition is central to the planning education offered at TU Delft, where students and professionals are trained to approach urban planning with a integrative perspective that combines technical expertise with a deep commitment to democratic processes and sustainable outcomes. ...
The TU Delft Strategic Planning Cycle is a comprehensive strategic planning model designed to enhance urban sustainability and inclusivity by incorporating a range of participatory tools and methodologies that facilitate broad stakeholder engagement through a detailed step-by-step planning cycle.
The TU Delft Strategic Planning Cycle is rooted in the Dutch tradition of democratic visioning and strategic planning, which emphasises the integration of policy and design alongside a strong participatory ethos. This tradition is central to the planning education offered at TU Delft, where students and professionals are trained to approach urban planning with a integrative perspective that combines technical expertise with a deep commitment to democratic processes and sustainable outcomes.
The TU Delft Strategic Planning Cycle is rooted in the Dutch tradition of democratic visioning and strategic planning, which emphasises the integration of policy and design alongside a strong participatory ethos. This tradition is central to the planning education offered at TU Delft, where students and professionals are trained to approach urban planning with a integrative perspective that combines technical expertise with a deep commitment to democratic processes and sustainable outcomes.
How just are Urban Sustainability Transition Plans?
Benchmarking Spatial Justice
The ongoing debates surrounding sustainability transitions in cities and regions highlight the urgent need to make these transitions fairer, more democratic, and inclusive. Currently, there is increasing recognition that sustainability transitions must be more just to avoid the risk of failure and the deepening of discontent with climate action, particularly in disadvantaged urban areas and among marginalised communities. Similarly, in the field of urban planning, there is a rapidly expanding body of literature on spatial justice, emphasising the need for more equitable planning in terms of the spatial distribution of benefits and burdens, fairness in procedures, and recognition of the diverse needs and interests of different social groups. However, planning practice has yet to keep pace with this trend, and there is a significant knowledge gap regarding how to measure and evaluate spatial justice in the planning process. This paper seeks to address this gap by proposing a spatial justice assessment tool for planning documents. We outline the conceptual model that underpins the tool and demonstrate its application across four European cities.
The assessment is conducted in two phases. The first phase involves using the Values, Strategies, Objectives, and Actions (VSOA) approach to distil essential part of their agenda from the documents prepared by the cities. This approach provides a framework for analysing key components and understanding how values are articulated and translated into actionable measures. It helps to identify the overall vision, the strategies designed to achieve it, the specific objectives set, and the tangible actions proposed. In the second phase, we employ spatial justice as a lens for a qualitative evaluation of how cities address the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and recognition justice within city-wide planning documents. This includes ensuring the fair distribution of burdens and benefits, focusing on processes that do not exacerbate inequalities, and being attentive to needs and aspirations of marginalised and vulnerable groups and identities affected by these transitions.
The paper applies the evaluation tool in four diverse urban contexts: Belfast, Rotterdam, Granollers, and Budapest. These cities vary in size, are located in different parts of Europe, and represent different planning cultures. The plans assessed also cover a range of climate action documents, from overarching sustainability transition plans to more specific energy transition or climate resilience plans. We present and critically evaluate the scores produced by the evaluation of the four planning documents, discussing these findings in relation to the existing literature and considering their implications for planning and policy practice in the context of delivering more just urban sustainability transitions. By deploying the tool in these varied settings, we demonstrate its versatility and broad applicability as a spatial justice assessment framework for urban planning practice. Additionally, we illustrate its potential as a critical discourse analytical tool, revealing the extent to which sustainability transition discourses in urban planning adhere to the principles of spatial justice. ...
The assessment is conducted in two phases. The first phase involves using the Values, Strategies, Objectives, and Actions (VSOA) approach to distil essential part of their agenda from the documents prepared by the cities. This approach provides a framework for analysing key components and understanding how values are articulated and translated into actionable measures. It helps to identify the overall vision, the strategies designed to achieve it, the specific objectives set, and the tangible actions proposed. In the second phase, we employ spatial justice as a lens for a qualitative evaluation of how cities address the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and recognition justice within city-wide planning documents. This includes ensuring the fair distribution of burdens and benefits, focusing on processes that do not exacerbate inequalities, and being attentive to needs and aspirations of marginalised and vulnerable groups and identities affected by these transitions.
The paper applies the evaluation tool in four diverse urban contexts: Belfast, Rotterdam, Granollers, and Budapest. These cities vary in size, are located in different parts of Europe, and represent different planning cultures. The plans assessed also cover a range of climate action documents, from overarching sustainability transition plans to more specific energy transition or climate resilience plans. We present and critically evaluate the scores produced by the evaluation of the four planning documents, discussing these findings in relation to the existing literature and considering their implications for planning and policy practice in the context of delivering more just urban sustainability transitions. By deploying the tool in these varied settings, we demonstrate its versatility and broad applicability as a spatial justice assessment framework for urban planning practice. Additionally, we illustrate its potential as a critical discourse analytical tool, revealing the extent to which sustainability transition discourses in urban planning adhere to the principles of spatial justice. ...
The ongoing debates surrounding sustainability transitions in cities and regions highlight the urgent need to make these transitions fairer, more democratic, and inclusive. Currently, there is increasing recognition that sustainability transitions must be more just to avoid the risk of failure and the deepening of discontent with climate action, particularly in disadvantaged urban areas and among marginalised communities. Similarly, in the field of urban planning, there is a rapidly expanding body of literature on spatial justice, emphasising the need for more equitable planning in terms of the spatial distribution of benefits and burdens, fairness in procedures, and recognition of the diverse needs and interests of different social groups. However, planning practice has yet to keep pace with this trend, and there is a significant knowledge gap regarding how to measure and evaluate spatial justice in the planning process. This paper seeks to address this gap by proposing a spatial justice assessment tool for planning documents. We outline the conceptual model that underpins the tool and demonstrate its application across four European cities.
The assessment is conducted in two phases. The first phase involves using the Values, Strategies, Objectives, and Actions (VSOA) approach to distil essential part of their agenda from the documents prepared by the cities. This approach provides a framework for analysing key components and understanding how values are articulated and translated into actionable measures. It helps to identify the overall vision, the strategies designed to achieve it, the specific objectives set, and the tangible actions proposed. In the second phase, we employ spatial justice as a lens for a qualitative evaluation of how cities address the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and recognition justice within city-wide planning documents. This includes ensuring the fair distribution of burdens and benefits, focusing on processes that do not exacerbate inequalities, and being attentive to needs and aspirations of marginalised and vulnerable groups and identities affected by these transitions.
The paper applies the evaluation tool in four diverse urban contexts: Belfast, Rotterdam, Granollers, and Budapest. These cities vary in size, are located in different parts of Europe, and represent different planning cultures. The plans assessed also cover a range of climate action documents, from overarching sustainability transition plans to more specific energy transition or climate resilience plans. We present and critically evaluate the scores produced by the evaluation of the four planning documents, discussing these findings in relation to the existing literature and considering their implications for planning and policy practice in the context of delivering more just urban sustainability transitions. By deploying the tool in these varied settings, we demonstrate its versatility and broad applicability as a spatial justice assessment framework for urban planning practice. Additionally, we illustrate its potential as a critical discourse analytical tool, revealing the extent to which sustainability transition discourses in urban planning adhere to the principles of spatial justice.
The assessment is conducted in two phases. The first phase involves using the Values, Strategies, Objectives, and Actions (VSOA) approach to distil essential part of their agenda from the documents prepared by the cities. This approach provides a framework for analysing key components and understanding how values are articulated and translated into actionable measures. It helps to identify the overall vision, the strategies designed to achieve it, the specific objectives set, and the tangible actions proposed. In the second phase, we employ spatial justice as a lens for a qualitative evaluation of how cities address the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and recognition justice within city-wide planning documents. This includes ensuring the fair distribution of burdens and benefits, focusing on processes that do not exacerbate inequalities, and being attentive to needs and aspirations of marginalised and vulnerable groups and identities affected by these transitions.
The paper applies the evaluation tool in four diverse urban contexts: Belfast, Rotterdam, Granollers, and Budapest. These cities vary in size, are located in different parts of Europe, and represent different planning cultures. The plans assessed also cover a range of climate action documents, from overarching sustainability transition plans to more specific energy transition or climate resilience plans. We present and critically evaluate the scores produced by the evaluation of the four planning documents, discussing these findings in relation to the existing literature and considering their implications for planning and policy practice in the context of delivering more just urban sustainability transitions. By deploying the tool in these varied settings, we demonstrate its versatility and broad applicability as a spatial justice assessment framework for urban planning practice. Additionally, we illustrate its potential as a critical discourse analytical tool, revealing the extent to which sustainability transition discourses in urban planning adhere to the principles of spatial justice.
De visie gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen is tussen oktober 2020 en maart 2021 ontwikkeld in opdracht van de stuurgroep Gemeenschappelijke Voorzieningen van de TU Delft. De opdracht was de volgende: ‘het ontwikkelen van een langetermijnvisie waarmee beslissingen over de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen genomen kunnen worden’. Deze publicatie geeft een richting aan het bepalen van de wenselijkheid van voorzieningen en voor het nemen van beslissingen over de huisvesting van deze voorzieningen. De visie doet uitspraken over de wijze waarop de gebouwde omgeving de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen optimaal kan faciliteren, over het combineren van programma’s binnen de TU Delft en de samenwerking met organisaties op en buiten de campus. We spreken hier doelbewust over ‘een richting’. Voor een visie waarmee werkelijk knopen kunnen worden doorgehakt is een groter kader nodig. Dit kader is een eenduidige visie op de campus, een visie die niet alleen over de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen gaat, maar ook de wensen en behoeften van studenten, het wonen op de campus, de relatie met de stad, duurzaamheid, ondernemingen op de campus en alles wat de campus de komende decennia nog kan gaan bieden beschrijft. Op dit moment is de visie op de campus verspreid over diverse studies en beleidsadviezen. Als kader voor de visie op de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen is er een aanzet tot een integrale visie geformuleerd, in de vorm van een vijftien punten document: Manifest 015.
Ook een samenhangend ruimtelijk model was nodig en is door ons op basis van het Ruimtelijk Ontwikkelperspectief uitgewerkt en aangescherpt.
Deze rapportage geeft vervolgens in hoofdstuk 4 een visie op de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen zoals die nu vast te stellen is, hierbij bespreken we de belangrijkste thema’s voor een visie en aanbevelingen voor de verschillende voorzieningen op de campus. In hoofdstuk 5 geven wij tenslotte de aanbevelingen voor een vervolg. ...
Ook een samenhangend ruimtelijk model was nodig en is door ons op basis van het Ruimtelijk Ontwikkelperspectief uitgewerkt en aangescherpt.
Deze rapportage geeft vervolgens in hoofdstuk 4 een visie op de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen zoals die nu vast te stellen is, hierbij bespreken we de belangrijkste thema’s voor een visie en aanbevelingen voor de verschillende voorzieningen op de campus. In hoofdstuk 5 geven wij tenslotte de aanbevelingen voor een vervolg. ...
De visie gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen is tussen oktober 2020 en maart 2021 ontwikkeld in opdracht van de stuurgroep Gemeenschappelijke Voorzieningen van de TU Delft. De opdracht was de volgende: ‘het ontwikkelen van een langetermijnvisie waarmee beslissingen over de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen genomen kunnen worden’. Deze publicatie geeft een richting aan het bepalen van de wenselijkheid van voorzieningen en voor het nemen van beslissingen over de huisvesting van deze voorzieningen. De visie doet uitspraken over de wijze waarop de gebouwde omgeving de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen optimaal kan faciliteren, over het combineren van programma’s binnen de TU Delft en de samenwerking met organisaties op en buiten de campus. We spreken hier doelbewust over ‘een richting’. Voor een visie waarmee werkelijk knopen kunnen worden doorgehakt is een groter kader nodig. Dit kader is een eenduidige visie op de campus, een visie die niet alleen over de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen gaat, maar ook de wensen en behoeften van studenten, het wonen op de campus, de relatie met de stad, duurzaamheid, ondernemingen op de campus en alles wat de campus de komende decennia nog kan gaan bieden beschrijft. Op dit moment is de visie op de campus verspreid over diverse studies en beleidsadviezen. Als kader voor de visie op de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen is er een aanzet tot een integrale visie geformuleerd, in de vorm van een vijftien punten document: Manifest 015.
Ook een samenhangend ruimtelijk model was nodig en is door ons op basis van het Ruimtelijk Ontwikkelperspectief uitgewerkt en aangescherpt.
Deze rapportage geeft vervolgens in hoofdstuk 4 een visie op de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen zoals die nu vast te stellen is, hierbij bespreken we de belangrijkste thema’s voor een visie en aanbevelingen voor de verschillende voorzieningen op de campus. In hoofdstuk 5 geven wij tenslotte de aanbevelingen voor een vervolg.
Ook een samenhangend ruimtelijk model was nodig en is door ons op basis van het Ruimtelijk Ontwikkelperspectief uitgewerkt en aangescherpt.
Deze rapportage geeft vervolgens in hoofdstuk 4 een visie op de gemeenschappelijke voorzieningen zoals die nu vast te stellen is, hierbij bespreken we de belangrijkste thema’s voor een visie en aanbevelingen voor de verschillende voorzieningen op de campus. In hoofdstuk 5 geven wij tenslotte de aanbevelingen voor een vervolg.