At

Annebel ten Broeke

info

Please Note

3 records found

Journal article (2026) - Patrick J. Thoral, Jesse de Metz, Stella Mulia, Annebel ten Broeke, Nicolaas Heyning, Birkitt L. ten Tusscher, Rolf K. Gigengack, Hilde M. Feijen, Caspar G. Chorus, More Authors
Background
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy (LST) is common in European ICUs but significant variations exist. Behaviour artificial intelligence technology (BAIT) may help standardize the ethical dilemma to continue or withdraw LST for patients already admitted to the ICU.

Methods
Several sessions with intensivists of an academic medical centre and a large urban teaching hospital were held to determine the criteria influencing the process. A discrete choice experiment was conducted during which 25 hypothetical cases were presented to the participants. For each case the participants had to decide whether they would continue, continue with a time limited trial of one week, or withdraw LST. The results of the experiment were used to develop a multinomial logistic regression model that was incorporated in a web-based decision-support system.

Results
Thirty-six participants (intensivists and fellows in intensive care medicine) completed the experiment. The estimated model consisted of twelve covariates and showed good model fit (McFadden’s ρ2 0.25). The most important covariates were age, patient values, expected cardiovascular and pulmonary impairment after ICU discharge and frailty at admission. The BAIT system lets intensivists view expected decisions based on documented criteria and uses color-coding to show the magnitude of the effect and its direction (i.e. to continue or withdraw LST).

Conclusions
We developed a BAIT system that may support clinicians facing the dilemma of continuing or withdrawing LST by elucidating the key criteria involved in assessing medical futility. ...

Lessons learned from behavioral artificial intelligence technology

Journal article (2023) - Otis C. van Varsseveld, Annebel ten Broeke, Caspar G. Chorus, Nicolaas Heyning, Elisabeth M.W. Kooi, Jan B.F. Hulscher
Background: Critical decision making in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is highly complex and hard to capture in decision rules due to case-specificity and high mortality risk. In this choice experiment, we aimed to identify the implicit weight of decision factors towards future decision support, and to assess potential differences between specialties or centers. Methods: Thirty-five hypothetical surgical NEC scenarios with different factor levels were evaluated by neonatal care experts of all Dutch neonatal care centers in an online environment, where a recommendation for surgery or comfort care was requested. We conducted choice analysis by constructing a binary logistic regression model according to behavioral artificial intelligence technology (BAIT). Results: Out of 109 invited neonatal care experts, 62 (57%) participated, including 45 neonatologists, 16 pediatric surgeons and one neonatology physician assistant. Cerebral ultrasound (Relative importance = 20%, OR = 4.06, 95% CI = 3.39–4.86) was the most important factor in the decision surgery versus comfort care in surgical NEC, nationwide and for all specialties and centers. Pediatric surgeons more often recommended surgery compared to neonatologists (62% vs. 57%, p = 0.03). For all centers, cerebral ultrasound, congenital comorbidity, hemodynamics and parental preferences were significant decision factors (p < 0.05). Sex (p = 0.14), growth since birth (p = 0.25), and estimated parental capacities (p = 0.06) had no significance in nationwide nor subgroup analyses. Conclusion: We demonstrated how BAIT can analyze the implicit weight of factors in the complex and critical decision for surgery or comfort care for (surgical) NEC. The findings reflect Dutch expertise, but the technique can be expanded internationally. After validation, our choice model/BAIT may function as decision aid. ...

What can transport modes learn from each other?

One of the main aims of introducing automation in transport is to improve safety by reducing or eliminating human errors; it is often argued however that this may induce new types of errors. There is different level of maturity with automation in different transport modes (road, aviation, maritime and rail), however no systematic research has been conducted on the lessons learned in different sectors, so that they can be exploited for the design of safer automated systems. The aim of this paper is to review the impact of key human factors on the safety of automated transport systems, with focus on relevant experiences from different transport sectors. A systematic literature review is carried out on the following topics: the level of trust in automation – in particular the impact of mis-aligned trust, i.e. mistrust vs overreliance, the resulting impact on operator situation awareness (SA), the implications for takeover control from machine to human, and the role of experience and training on using automated transport systems. The results revealed several areas where experiences from the aviation and road domain can be transferable to other sectors. Experiences from maritime and rail transport, although limited, tend to confirm the general patterns. Remarkably, in the road sector where higher levels of automation are only recently introduced, there are clearer and more quantitative approaches to human factors, while other sectors focus only on mental modes. Other sectors could use similar approaches to define their own context-specific metrics. The paper makes a synthesis of key messages on automation safety in different transport sectors, and presents an assessment of their transferability. ...