Currently, the building industry contributes to up to 50% of climate change. A way to reduce the impact is by replacing current building materials with more environmentally friendly materials, such as timber. Engineered wood products, such as cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels, have increased strength, stiffness, and stability which enables building higher buildings and floors with bigger spans. However, due to the low weight of timber, CLT floors are susceptible to unwanted high floor vibrations and therefore need to be verified on their footfall-induced vibration performance. Predicting the vibration performance is a complex problem as the load-bearing structure and architectural finishing have distinct structural behavior under small vibrations. Due to the novelty of the problem, the distinct behavior is not captured well in the current design codes. As a result, the Eurocode 5 guidelines on vibrations are currently being updated and extended. In support, this thesis addresses the critical issue of predicting the vibration performance of CLT floors, with a specific focus on the impact of architectural finishing. To achieve this goal, a literature review was conducted to identify structural components that are often overlooked, but may lead to inaccuracies in vibration predictions. These factors include the connections between CLT panels and different types of floor finishing. A case study was then carried out using the building HOUTlab, which features CLT floors with a concrete floating screed. On-site measurements were performed at key locations, including at the inter-panel connection line and in the middle of the panel. This was done before and after architectural finishing was placed. Subsequently, analytical and numerical calculations were used to gain insight into the structural behavior of the system subject to footfall-loading by investigating the accuracy of common engineering practices and other assumptions regarding their structural behavior. Onsite measurements, where the floor was loaded and the response was measured at the same location, showed that the root mean square velocity (vrms) values were much higher at the inter-panel connection line compared to in the middle of the panel. The vrms is a measure of the amplitude of the vibration. The initial finite element analysis (FEA), assuming a rigid inter-panel connection, inaccurately located the highest vrms values. When assuming a hinge, the FEA correctly allocated the critical vrms values but compromised the accuracy of frequency estimates. The experimental results revealed that adding architectural finishing increased the damping, reduced the vrms, and maintained a similar frequency, ultimately improving the vibration performance from level 3 to level 1 according to the preliminary Eurocode 5 (prEC5) standards. The prEC5 and FEA following common engineering practices accurately estimated the frequency before architectural finishing was placed but underestimated it by 39% after it was placed, indicating a higher increase in the bending stiffness of the floor than initially assumed. While prior calculations assumed slip between the floor layers due to the presence of the insulation layer, assuming full cooperation between the layers resulted in an overestimation of the frequency by 9%, suggesting that there is some cooperation, but the floors are not fully bonded...