Timber modular buildings are an emerging construction method, due to the environmental and construction speed benefits. However, the inherent discontinuity and limited deformation capacity, hinders their ability to effectively redistribute loads under accidental load cases and thus, their robustness. A method to quantify the robustness of a building is to assess its behavior under notional column removal scenarios. This study numerically investigates the behavior of a hypothetical five-storey timber post-and-beam modular building under accidental damage events represented by four different column removal scenarios. The findings indicate that the structure could develop sufficient alternative load paths to sustain the amplified accidental limit state design load in most cases, primarily through flexural mechanisms. However, due to the limited ductility of these mechanisms, modular connections were optimally redesigned to enhance axial elongation and capacity, enabling the development of catenary action. The most effective strategy for achieving a robust catenary response was the introduction of a fuse element, significantly improving the ductility of the connection and enhancing the overall structural robustness.

This case study explores the utilization of distributed fiber optic sensors (DFOS) in wooden foundation piles, for assessing and monitoring the stress distribution along their length. Three spruce and three pine foundation piles instrumented with DFOS were driven into the soil in a testing field in Amsterdam and axially loaded in compression. Since DFOS provided strain information, calculating the stress distribution in the piles required knowledge of their stiffness properties, which inherently vary from the head to the tip. Consequently, the piles were extracted and their overall wet dynamic elastic modulus (E_c,0,dyn,wet) was determined through frequency response measurements. Subsequently, the piles were segmented, transported to the TU Delft Laboratory and subjected to mechanical testing. For each segment, the mechanical properties were determined and their variability along the pile was studied, in particular for the static modulus of elasticity (E_c,0,stat,wet). This enabled a comprehensive assessment of the actual in-situ stress distribution (Δσ_actual,stat and Δσ_actual,dyn) along the length of the piles, calculated with DFOS strains and the pile stiffness (E_c,0,stat,wet and E_c,0,stat,dyn). Given the novelty of the DFOS application to timber piles, a validation of the accuracy was conducted on 3 pile segments equipped with DFOS. These segments underwent laboratory compression testing, allowing for a direct comparison between DFOS strain readings and strains measured with linear potentiometers attached to the pile segments. The results revealed good accuracy of DFOS in controlled lab conditions, with a maximum stress deviation of 0.65 MPa. Since the testing field featured a 6-meter-deep predrilled layer, where negligible shaft friction was mobilized, the no-friction stress (Δσ_no-friction) approximately aligned with Δσ_actual,stat on the piles. At pile tips, the maximum applied 300–350 kN compressive load (i.e. Δσ_no-friction = 20–26 MPa), resulted in Δσ_actual,stat = 4–7 MPa, highlighting shaft friction effect. The calculated Δσ_actual,dyn with a single E_c,0,stat,dyn for the whole pile, led to 3 MPa stress overestimation at pile tip. Although this calculation is conservative, the detailed knowledge of the variation of stiffness properties along the pile would result in a more efficient structural use.