Alternative Load Path Analysis of Timber Post-And-Beam Modular Buildings

Conference Paper (2025)
Author(s)

M.P. Felicita (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa), ETH Zürich)

Joep Knuppe (Pieters Bouwtechniek)

Kyle Zutt (Van Rossum Raadgevende Ingenieurs BV)

Geert Ravenshorst (TU Delft - Bio-based Structures & Materials)

Michele Mirra (TU Delft - Bio-based Structures & Materials)

Research Group
Bio-based Structures & Materials
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.52202/080513-0050
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Bio-based Structures & Materials
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. @en
Pages (from-to)
400-409
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Timber modular buildings are an emerging construction method, due to the environmental and construction speed benefits. However, the inherent discontinuity and limited deformation capacity, hinders their ability to effectively redistribute loads under accidental load cases and thus, their robustness. A method to quantify the robustness of a building is to assess its behavior under notional column removal scenarios. This study numerically investigates the behavior of a hypothetical five-storey timber post-and-beam modular building under accidental damage events represented by four different column removal scenarios. The findings indicate that the structure could develop sufficient alternative load paths to sustain the amplified accidental limit state design load in most cases, primarily through flexural mechanisms. However, due to the limited ductility of these mechanisms, modular connections were optimally redesigned to enhance axial elongation and capacity, enabling the development of catenary action. The most effective strategy for achieving a robust catenary response was the introduction of a fuse element, significantly improving the ductility of the connection and enhancing the overall structural robustness.

Files

080513-0050open.pdf
(pdf | 2.69 Mb)
License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 26-12-2025