Computational Thinking (CT), particularly abstraction, is essential in engineering education, enabling students to break down complex systems into manageable parts. Abstraction helps learners focus on key elements of a problem, ignoring extraneous details. The PGK framework, suggested by Per-renet, Groote, and Kaasenbrood, defines abstraction across four cognitive levels: problem, algorithm, program, and execution. At a higher education institution that focuses on engineering education, we assessed students' abstraction skills using sorting algorithms, chosen for their foundational role and suitability for testing such skills. Our study focused on two areas: (1) the performance of computer science (CS) and non-CS students on algorithmic abstraction tasks, and (2) how factors like demographics, training, programming proficiency, and self-assessed abstraction mastery correlate with task performance. Results showed that all students, especially non-CS majors (including Engineering), need stronger skills at the algorithm, program (coding algorithms), and execution (code functionality) levels. Many non-CS students overestimated their abilities, highlighting a gap in mastery. Students with programming experience performed better, underscoring the importance of hands-on training. These findings suggest interventions for non-CS students are needed to gain experience in programming and to bridge the gap between perceived and actual skills. Future research should focus on discipline-specific curricula and long-term studies to ensure that all students develop the essential CT skills for the digital era.

This pilot study explores how visualization strategies, grounded in multiple representations theory, impact novice students’ engagement, and cognitive load during program tracing tasks. Students were were shown a visualization of the three-variable swap problem at the start of an introductory programming course (CS1) at a large public North American research-intensive university. We compared three conditions: interactive multiple representations, Python Tutor (a single-representation tool), and text-only methods. Preliminary results indicate that interactive multiple representations increase engagement for students with prior programming experience, while no significant differences were observed for students without prior experience. These findings suggest that while multiple representations may boost engagement, identifying how to effectively support students of all experience levels and reduce cognitive load requires further study.