C. Zhou
Please Note
11 records found
1
The dependency structure between hydrological variables is of critical importance to hydrological modelling and forecasting. When a copula capturing that dependence is fitted to a sample, information on the uncertainty of the fit is needed for subsequent hydrological calculations and reasoning. A new method is proposed to report inferential uncertainty in a copula parameter. The method is based on confidence curves constructed with the use of a pseudo maximum likelihood estimator for the copula parameter. The method was tested on synthetic data and then used as a tool in two hydrological examples. The first examines the probability of major floods in two locations on the Rhine River and its tributaries in the same calendar year. In the second example, rainfall–runoff from a karst region in Tunisia was analysed to determine a confidence interval for the delay between precipitation and runoff.
The representation of uncertainty in results is an important aspect of statistical techniques in hydrology and climatology. Hypothesis tests and point estimates are not well suited for this purpose. Other statistical tools, such as confidence curves, are better suited to represent uncertainty. Therefore three parametric methods to construct confidence curves for the location of a sudden change in the properties of a time series, a change point (CP), are analyzed for three distributions: log-normal, gamma, and Gumbel. Two types of change are considered: a change in the mean and a change in the standard deviation. A question that confidence curves do not answer is how likely the null hypothesis of ‘no change’ is. A possible statistic to help answer this question, denoted by Un, is introduced and analyzed. It is compared to the statistic that underlies the Pettitt test. All methods perform well in terms of coverage and confidence set size. One method is based on the profile likelihood for a CP, the other two, first defined in this article, on the pseudolikelihood for a CP. The main advantage of the pseudolikelihood over the profile likelihood lies in the much lower computational cost. The confidence curves generated by the three methods are very similar. In a limited test on time series of measurements found in the literature, the methods gave results that largely matched those reported elsewhere. Some results are also given for an order one autoregressive series with a lognormal marginal distribution.
Several commonly-used nonparametric change-point detection methods are analysed in terms of power, ability and accuracy of the estimated change-point location. The analysis is performed with synthetic data for different sample sizes, two types of change and different magnitudes of change. The methods studied are the Pettitt method, a method based on the Cramér von Mises (CvM) two-sample test statistic and a variant of the CUSUM method. The methods differ considerably in behaviour. For all methods the spread of estimated change-point location increases significantly for points near one of the ends of the sample. Series of annual maximum runoff for four stations on the Yangtze River in China are used to examine the performance of the methods on real data. It was found that the CvM-based test gave the best results, but all three methods suffer from bias and low detection rates for change points near the ends of the series.