This project investigates the rising interest in psychedelic substances, particularly microdosing, for well-being and self-development, with a focus on stimulating public discourse about its potential benefits, risks, and challenges as a future socially accepted practice. Utilizing critical and speculative design approaches, the research aims to provoke critical thinking by exploring the tensions and future trajectories surrounding the increasing media attention and popularization of psychedelic microdosing.

The project is grounded in extensive research, which includes a literature review of existing microdosing studies, semi-structured interviews with members of psychedelic societies, an online questionnaire cataloging diverse microdosing practices, and observational activities at various microdosing events. This foundational research identified four key themes for deeper exploration: (1) A Paradigm Shift, which examines the varying perspectives on psychedelic use in Western culture; (2) Microdosing as Technologies-of-Self, which looks at microdosing as a method of self-regulation for purposes like well-being and cognitive enhancement; (3) The Role of Intuition, which contrasts intuitive practices with strict protocols; and (4) Evidential Basis, which underscores the research gap in understanding the health effects of microdosing.

Speculative artifacts were then created to address the issues and initial tensions identified within these themes. These artifacts, shared with a diverse audience, served as a catalyst for reflection and discussion. Through this process, the project identified four overarching tensions: Perspective, which highlights conflicting views on the use of psychedelics between spiritual and utilitarian perspectives; Reasoning, which explores the tension between intuitive and logical decision-making in substance use; Outcome, which examines the tension between microdosing for self-discovery versus self-regulation; and Potential, which discusses the disparity between the hype and reality of microdosing.

These tensions are particularly evident in the workplace context, where the project critiques the commodified approach to microdosing, especially within the “Silicon Valley” culture. This exploration reveals the contrast between the healing and spiritual purposes of psychedelics and their pragmatic, corporate use, raising significant ethical concerns. One of the primary concerns is the potential for microdosing to be used by employers or authorities as a means to control and regulate employee performance, shifting the focus away from individual well-being in favor of profit-driven motives. The media’s portrayal of microdosing as a tool for cognitive enhancement is critiqued for creating an illusion of quick fixes for deeper personal or systemic issues.

The project also addresses the risk of commodifying indigenous traditions and plant-based medicines within Western corporate contexts. It raises important ethical questions about the implications of using psychedelics purely for capitalist gains, urging a broader reflection on the social and ethical consequences of integrating microdosing into corporate culture.

In conclusion, the project contributes to ongoing debates about the future of psychedelic microdosing, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of its ethical and social impacts before it becomes a mainstream practice, particularly in the corporate world.