Shoreface nourishments have become a popular management option to mitigate coastal retreat for sites with abundant sand supplies. With shoreface nourishments, relatively large volumes of off-site sand are placed under water in typical water depths of 4–10 m. This part of the nearshore zone has a high bed level variability and contains a myriad of (rhythmic) morphological features. As a result, understanding and forecasting shoreface nourishment morphodynamics and impacts is challenging. Significant progress on this topic is needed in due time, especially in light of emerging climate-change effects. This review paper presents an overview of field, laboratory and numerical modeling studies on shoreface nourishment morphodynamics. We have identified 4 key knowledge gaps. First, the spreading of nourished sand through the coastal zone is poorly understood, and has not been quantified. Second, it is unclear how design variables such as size, placement location and grain-size affect the lifetime, spreading and impact of shoreface nourishments. Third, the cumulative effect of repeated shoreface nourishments (scale: 1–10 km, 1–10 years) on the coastal system as a whole (100+ km, 50+ years) is largely unknown. Fourth, numerical models cannot reliably predict the complete morphological development and impact of shoreface nourishments. To tackle these knowledge gaps we propose a research agenda to ensure the generation and valuation of scientifically robust and societally relevant knowledge.

To address the important research question of whether implicit (bottom friction) or explicit (stem drag) dissipation models are most appropriate for the prediction of wave attenuation due to aquatic vegetation, the Simulating Waves Nearshore (SWAN) spectral wave model has been extended with an explicit frequency-dependent dissipation model for submerged and emergent vegetation. The new explicit model is compared to existing explicit and implicit dissipation models in SWAN, and the distinguishing features of each of the dissipation models are quantified. The present work verifies the implementation of the new and existing dissipation models, outlines their distinguishing features, and compares model predictions against experimental data. The emphasis is on the transformation of the spectral wave periods Tm0;1 and Tm 1;0 over a canopy. Model evaluation based on academic and laboratory cases allows for recommendations regarding applicability of the three dissipation models, where the new method has the broadest applicability, since it bridges the gap in applicability between the other two dissipation models. The implementation of Jacobsen, McFall, and van der A (2019; A frequency distributed dissipation model for canopies; Coastal Engineering, 150, 135-146) is publicly available in SWAN version 41.31B.