Left ventricular flow is intrinsically complex, three-dimensional and unsteady. Its features are susceptible to cardiovascular pathology and treatment, in particular to surgical interventions involving the valves (mitral valve replacement). To improve our understanding of intraventricular fluid mechanics and the impact of various types of prosthetic valves thereon, we have developed a custom-designed versatile left ventricular phantom with anatomically realistic moving left ventricular membrane. A biological, a tilting disc and a bileaflet valve (in two different orientations) were mounted in the mitral position and tested under the same settings. To investigate 3D flow within the phantom, a four-view tomographic particle image velocimetry setup has been implemented. The results compare side-by-side the evolution of the 3D flow topology, vortical structures and kinetic energy in the left ventricle domain during the cardiac cycle. Except for the tilting disc valve, all tested prosthetic valves induced a crossed flow path, where the outflow crosses the inflow path, passing under the mitral valve. The biological valve shows a strong jet with a peak velocity about twice as high compared to all mechanical heart valves, which makes it easier to penetrate deeply into the cavity. Accordingly, the peak kinetic energy in the left ventricle in case of the biological valve is about four times higher than the mechanical heart valves. We conclude that the tomographic particle imaging velocimetry setup provides a useful ground truth measurement of flow features and allows a comparison of the effects of different valve types on left ventricular flow patterns.@en

Personalized treatment informed by computational models has the potential to markedly improve the outcome for patients with a type B aortic dissection. However, existing computational models of dissected walls significantly simplify the characteristic false lumen, tears and/or material behavior. Moreover, the patient-specific wall thickness and stiffness cannot be accurately captured non-invasively in clinical practice, which inevitably leads to assumptions in these wall models. It is important to evaluate the impact of the corresponding uncertainty on the predicted wall deformations and stress, which are both key outcome indicators for treatment optimization. Therefore, a physiology-inspired finite element framework was proposed to model the wall deformation and stress of a type B aortic dissection at diastolic and systolic pressure. Based on this framework, 300 finite element analyses, sampled with a Latin hypercube, were performed to assess the global uncertainty, introduced by 4 uncertain wall thickness and stiffness input parameters, on 4 displacement and stress output parameters. The specific impact of each input parameter was estimated using Gaussian process regression, as surrogate model of the finite element framework, and a δ moment-independent analysis. The global uncertainty analysis indicated minor differences between the uncertainty at diastolic and systolic pressure. For all output parameters, the 4th quartile contained the major fraction of the uncertainty. The parameter-specific uncertainty analysis elucidated that the material stiffness and relative thickness of the dissected membrane were the respective main determinants of the wall deformation and stress. The uncertainty analysis provides insight into the effect of uncertain wall thickness and stiffness parameters on the predicted deformation and stress. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for probabilistic rather than deterministic predictions for clinical decision making in aortic dissections.@en