The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of waste activated sludge (WAS) predation by the aquatic worm Tubifex tubifex (T. tubifex) on the overall biodegradability of WAS. The initial WAS biodegradability potential was determined in 80 days sequential batch-fed anaerobic and aerobic treatment combinations. These treatment combinations were used as a reference for comparison with the effect of 5-day predation and 40-day anaerobic treatment combinations. Predation and the subsequent anaerobic digestion of the predated solids shows superior solids removal and superior overall conversion rates compared to solely conventional anaerobic digestion. Strikingly, the predation and anaerobic treatment combinations reached the same chemical oxygen demand (COD) and volatile solids (VS) reduction as the reference processes, i.e. 58% and 49% for COD and VS, respectively. Our results show that predation and anaerobic treatment combinations increase solids removal rates, but do not alter the overall biodegradability potential of WAS.@en

Inhibition effect of humic acid (HA) on anaerobic digestion of cellulose and xylan and the mitigation potential of the inhibition were evaluated in controlled fed batch reactors at 30 °C and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 20 days. Reactor performances were evaluated by biogas production and metabolite measurements for 220 days. Microbial population dynamics of the reactors were monitored with next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing at nine different sampling times. Our results showed that increasing levels of HA inhibited the hydrolysis efficiency of the digestion by 40% and concomitantly reduced the methane yield. Addition of hydrolytic enzymes helped to reverse the negative effects of HA, whereas calcium addition did not reverse HA inhibition. Microbiological analyses showed that the relative abundance of hydrolytic/fermentative bacterial groups such as Clostridiales, Bacteroidales and Anaerolineales was significantly lowered by the presence of HA. HA also affected the archaeal populations. Mostly hydrogenotrophic methanogens were negatively affected by HA. The relative abundance of Methanobacteriaceae, Methanomicrobiales-WCHA208 and Unassigned Thermoplasmata WCHA1-57 were negatively affected by the presence of HA, whereas Methanosaetacea was not affected.@en

Worm predation (WP) by Tubifex tubifex was investigated using waste activated sludge (WAS) as the substrate. In order to better understand the sludge degradation mechanisms during WP, the activity of five common hydrolytic enzymes was determined and compared among the initial feed activated sludge, endogenous respirated sludge and worm predated sludge. The results showed that the enzymatic activity decreased upon aerobic (worm) treatment of WAS and that this activity was predominantly associated with the removed solids fraction of the sludge. Interestingly, the protease activity showed a smaller decrease in activity when the worms were present. Flow cell cytometry revealed the release of intestinal bacteria from the worms, which are presumed to be largely responsible for the observed protease activity. Additionally, experiments in which T. tubifex were treated with antibiotics showed that the worms are responsible for a maximum of 73% of the observed proteolytic activity. The remaining 27% is attributed to the intestinal bacteria that exhibit a synergistic relationship with T. tubifex towards protein hydrolysis.@en

Sludge predation by aquatic worms results in an increased sludge reduction rate, which is mainly due to the specific removal of a protein fraction from the sludge. As microorganisms play an essential role in sludge hydrolysis a better understanding of the microbial community involved in the worm predation process will provide more insight into the relations between the aquatic worms, their associated microbiome and the efficient sludge reduction. In this study, the microbial community associated with predation by the Tubifex tubifex was investigated. The microbial diversity in the samples of the worm faeces (WF), predated activated sludge and protein-rich substrates were compared. The results indicated that predation on sludge resulted in a microbial change from Actinobacteria (44%) in the sludge, to Proteobacteria (64%) and Bacteriodites (36%) in the WF. Interestingly, the faecal microbial community was more related to the community in (predated) protein-rich substrates than to the community in predated or endogenously respirated activated sludge samples. This similar microbial community could be due to microbial utilisation of protein hydrolysis products. Alternatively, conditions in the worm gut could facilitate a protein hydrolysing community which assists in protein hydrolysis. The genera Burkholderiales, Chryseobacterium and Flavobacterium were found to be associated with predation by T. tubifex.@en

Worm predation (WP) on activated sludge leads to increased sludge degradation rates, irrespective of the type of worm used or reactor conditions employed. However, the cause of the increased sludge degradation rates remains unknown. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the physical and biochemical aspects of predated sludge, providing insight into the hydrolytic mechanisms underlying WP. To this end, the sessile worm Tubifex tubifex was used as a model oligochaete and was batch cultivated in an 18-L airlift reactor. Predation on activated sludge showed an average reduction rate of 12 ± 3.8%/d versus 2 ± 1.3%/d for endogenous respirated sludge. Sludge predation resulted in an increased release of inorganic nitrogen, phosphate and soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD). The sCOD consisted mainly of polysaccharides; however, fluorescence excitation emission matrix spectroscopy analysis also revealed the presence of Tryptophan-protein-like substances. Results suggest that the released polysaccharides contain a protein-like element. Additionally, soluble iron increased slightly in concentration after WP. The extent of hydrolysis seemed to reach an average plateau of about 40% volatile solids (VS) reduction after 4 days, which is substantially higher than the 29% VS reduction for endogenous decay of activated sludge after 30 days. Furthermore, T. tubifex predominantly consumed the protein fraction of the extracellular polymeric substances. Results suggest that that the worms specifically target a fraction of the sludge that is predominantly biodegradable under aerobic conditions, albeit at significantly higher degradation rates when compared to the endogenous decay of waste activated sludge.@en

The impact of humic acid (HA) on methanogenic activity was investigated. Methanogenic crushed granular sludge and pure cultures of mesophilic methanogens were incubated in batch cultures with HA. Initial methane production rates and substrate consumption rates were quantified. In the presence of 1 kg m−3 HA, the methane production rate of all hydrogenotrophic methanogens was inhibited by more than 75%, except Methanospirillum hungatei that was not inhibited up to 5 kg m−3 HA. The acetoclastic Methanosarcina barkeri was completely inhibited by HA ≥1 kg m−3. However, Methanosaeta concilii was only slightly affected by HA up to 3 kg m−3. When methanogenic granular sludge was incubated with HA, the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) tests showed less inhibition, when compared to the pure cultures of methanogens. The SMA test with H2/CO2, formate and acetate showed reduced initial methane production rate of 42%, 23% and 40%, respectively. Differences in HA susceptibility were explained by differences in cell wall structure.@en

The impact of humic acid (HA) on methanogenic activity was investigated. Methanogenic crushed granular sludge and pure cultures of mesophilic methanogens were incubated in batch cultures with HA. Initial methane production rates and substrate consumption rates were quantified. In the presence of 1 kg m−3 HA, the methane production rate of all hydrogenotrophic methanogens was inhibited by more than 75%, except Methanospirillum hungatei that was not inhibited up to 5 kg m−3 HA. The acetoclastic Methanosarcina barkeri was completely inhibited by HA ≥1 kg m−3. However, Methanosaeta concilii was only slightly affected by HA up to 3 kg m−3. When methanogenic granular sludge was incubated with HA, the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) tests showed less inhibition, when compared to the pure cultures of methanogens. The SMA test with H2/CO2, formate and acetate showed reduced initial methane production rate of 42%, 23% and 40%, respectively. Differences in HA susceptibility were explained by differences in cell wall structure.@en