K. Li
Please Note
20 records found
1
In CCS wells, cyclic injection of cold CO2 into the hot subsurface may lead to debonding between sealant and steel casing. We test how thermal cycling affects the sealing ability of five different types of sealant (S1 to S5) surrounding a simulated steel wellbore. We use cylindrical sealant samples with a stainless steel (AISI 316 L) pipe in the centre, cured at 150°C and 30 MPa for 28 days. Using 3 bar N2 leak tests at room temperature, we test how much the sealant-steel interface leaks before and after thermal cycling under unconfined and confined (1.5 MPa) conditions. We also conduct push-off experiments using a 500 kN loading frame before and after. For the unconfined test, we place the sample on a custom-built jig, whereas for confined tests we have a similar assembly inside a conventional triaxial vessel. The samples are brought to 60°C. Subsequently, we inject 5°C water through the central pipe at 80 mL/min for 2 mins, and let the sample reheat for 12 mins. We repeat this 16 times. Afterwards, we allow the sample to cool to room temperature, and repeat the N2 leak test in-situ. The results show that under unconfined conditions, the interface leaks more for all sealant types except S3. The key parameter controlling performance is the linear thermal expansion coefficient, where an expansion coefficient closer to that of steel indicates better performance. Under confinement, all sealant types perform better post-thermal cycling, due to the prolonged exposure to confining pressure.
This paper reports exposure of five different sealants to CO2-saturated water and wet supercritical CO2 at in-situ conditions (80 °C and 10 MPa). Three of the sealants investigated are based on Portland Cement, while the other two are based on Calcium Aluminate Cement, and a rock-based geopolymer specifically developed for Geological CO2 Storage (GCS). The five sealants were selected to represent different methods for improving wellbore seal integrity, such as restricting permeability (and porosity), or modifying how the material interacts with CO2-bearing fluids. Exposures were carried out in a purpose-built batch apparatus, enabling simultaneous exposure of up to 10 samples in total to CO2-saturated water and wet supercritical CO2.
After exposure, changes in the sealants’ microstructures and chemical and mineralogical compositions were assessed using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, computed tomography scanning, and fluid chemical analysis. The impact of exposure to CO2-bearing fluids was interpreted in terms of alteration and degradation of the materials, to compare how different sealant design modifications can be employed to enhance wellbore integrity. ...
This paper reports exposure of five different sealants to CO2-saturated water and wet supercritical CO2 at in-situ conditions (80 °C and 10 MPa). Three of the sealants investigated are based on Portland Cement, while the other two are based on Calcium Aluminate Cement, and a rock-based geopolymer specifically developed for Geological CO2 Storage (GCS). The five sealants were selected to represent different methods for improving wellbore seal integrity, such as restricting permeability (and porosity), or modifying how the material interacts with CO2-bearing fluids. Exposures were carried out in a purpose-built batch apparatus, enabling simultaneous exposure of up to 10 samples in total to CO2-saturated water and wet supercritical CO2.
After exposure, changes in the sealants’ microstructures and chemical and mineralogical compositions were assessed using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, computed tomography scanning, and fluid chemical analysis. The impact of exposure to CO2-bearing fluids was interpreted in terms of alteration and degradation of the materials, to compare how different sealant design modifications can be employed to enhance wellbore integrity.
The results show that during exposure to CO2-saturated water, the presence of H2S mostly resulted in enhanced sealant alteration depths, and reduced carbonate precipitation. During exposure to wet supercritical CO2, the presence of H2S or H2SO4 resulted in reduced carbonate precipitation, and enhanced alteration depths in some (H2S) or all (H2SO4) sealants. Additionally, relatively minor degradation was observed in the outer 100–200 μm of samples exposed in the presence of H2SO4. Overall, the impacts of impurities were more pronounced for sealants that were more affected by exposure to clean CO2. ...
The results show that during exposure to CO2-saturated water, the presence of H2S mostly resulted in enhanced sealant alteration depths, and reduced carbonate precipitation. During exposure to wet supercritical CO2, the presence of H2S or H2SO4 resulted in reduced carbonate precipitation, and enhanced alteration depths in some (H2S) or all (H2SO4) sealants. Additionally, relatively minor degradation was observed in the outer 100–200 μm of samples exposed in the presence of H2SO4. Overall, the impacts of impurities were more pronounced for sealants that were more affected by exposure to clean CO2.
Sealants that can guarantee long-term wellbore sealing integrity are of great significance to the safe and sustainable storage of CO2 in carbon capture and storage (CCS). In this study, we investigate how abrupt cyclic thermal shocks affect the integrity of four sealants of different compositions. These sealants include two reference OPC-based blends (S1 and S2), one newly-designed OPC-based blend that contains CO2-sequestering additives (S3), and one calcium aluminate cement (CAC)-based blend designed for CCS applications (S4). We have measured the thermal properties of these samples, followed by quenching and flow-through experiments to apply strong cyclic thermal shocks on samples of the four sealants, where we heated the samples to 120 °C, and quenched them in, or flowed through water of 20 °C. Using X-ray tomography (32 µm/voxel) before and after the experiment showed that both S1, S2 (reference OPC-based) and S4 (CAC-based) broke after thermal-shocking experiments. Cracks and new voids developed in the samples. Post-treatment strength testing shows that thermal shocks reduce the unconfined compressive strength of these three sealants. This implies that these compositions may not be optimal materials for long-term wellbore sealing during CO2 injection and storage afterward. For all these three sealant compositions, quenching resulted in a greater reduction in strength (by 53 % on average) than flow-through experiments (by 29 % on average). On the contrary, we have not observed any cracks after either quenching or flow-through experiments in S3 sealant (OPC with CO2-sequestering additives). We attribute the intactness of this sealant after thermal shocks to its higher thermal diffusivity than the other three sealants. Heat transfers more rapidly in this sealant and the associated thermal stresses are mild and insufficient to cause any damage to its integrity, which makes this sealant a good candidate for wellbore sealing material that can effectively withstand strong thermal shocks encountered during CCS, though further studies are required.
In this paper, we report a novel technique to investigate cracking in cement by thermal shocks under in-situ temperature and pressure. To this end, we use a triaxial deformation apparatus capable of mounting a cement sample in a vessel at a confining pressure of up to 70 MPa, with an axial stress up to 26 MPa. An internal furnace is used to achieve an elevated temperature in the vessel. Pore fluid lines are fitted in upper and lower axial pistons to allow water injection. In this study, we use a solid neat cement sample (∅30×70 mm, water-to-cement ratio: 0.3) cured at 20ºC and ambient pressure for 28 days. During the experiments, the triaxial vessel is filled with heat-resistant oil which provides the confining pressure. The cement sample is isolated from the oil using a thin Teflon jacket. We load the sample at different in-situ states of hydrostatic stress and heat the sample assembly to various elevated temperatures (60 - 120ºC). We then inject cold water (20ºC) through the sample using two high-pressure syringe pumps at a designated flow rate for a given time. In the vessel, three linear variable differential transducers (LVDT) mounted parallel to, and span around the sample are used to calculate axial and radial strain, respectively. Two thermocouples, one mounted on the middle of the sample (outside the jacket), and another inside the upper pore fluid line, are used to measure temperature. To study how and where cracks initiate and grow in the cement under thermal shocks, we measure permeability with a differential pressure transducer measuring the difference between the up- and down-stream pore fluid line, and we use a micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) scanner to characterize the microstructure of the cement sample before and after the experiments. This provides valuable expedience to investigate the thermal effects on the integrity of cement under different in-situ conditions for CCS wells. The pistons of the setup can also be readily adjusted to study how de-bonding between casing and cement, and cracks in the cement develop for composite cement samples (with analogous casing) under thermal cycling. ...
In this paper, we report a novel technique to investigate cracking in cement by thermal shocks under in-situ temperature and pressure. To this end, we use a triaxial deformation apparatus capable of mounting a cement sample in a vessel at a confining pressure of up to 70 MPa, with an axial stress up to 26 MPa. An internal furnace is used to achieve an elevated temperature in the vessel. Pore fluid lines are fitted in upper and lower axial pistons to allow water injection. In this study, we use a solid neat cement sample (∅30×70 mm, water-to-cement ratio: 0.3) cured at 20ºC and ambient pressure for 28 days. During the experiments, the triaxial vessel is filled with heat-resistant oil which provides the confining pressure. The cement sample is isolated from the oil using a thin Teflon jacket. We load the sample at different in-situ states of hydrostatic stress and heat the sample assembly to various elevated temperatures (60 - 120ºC). We then inject cold water (20ºC) through the sample using two high-pressure syringe pumps at a designated flow rate for a given time. In the vessel, three linear variable differential transducers (LVDT) mounted parallel to, and span around the sample are used to calculate axial and radial strain, respectively. Two thermocouples, one mounted on the middle of the sample (outside the jacket), and another inside the upper pore fluid line, are used to measure temperature. To study how and where cracks initiate and grow in the cement under thermal shocks, we measure permeability with a differential pressure transducer measuring the difference between the up- and down-stream pore fluid line, and we use a micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) scanner to characterize the microstructure of the cement sample before and after the experiments. This provides valuable expedience to investigate the thermal effects on the integrity of cement under different in-situ conditions for CCS wells. The pistons of the setup can also be readily adjusted to study how de-bonding between casing and cement, and cracks in the cement develop for composite cement samples (with analogous casing) under thermal cycling.
Foam is applied in enhanced oil recovery to improve the sweep of injected gas and increase oil recovery, by greatly reducing the mobility of gas. In the laboratory, X-ray computed tomography is commonly used to evaluate the performance of foam in core plugs. However, foam properties, such as bubble size and capillary pressure, are much more difficult to measure. In recent years, microfluidic models have gained much attention because they easily facilitate the imaging study of in-situ foam. However, it is still challenging to estimate capillary pressure, in a model with a uniform depth of etching. In this paper, we report a novel technique to estimate water saturation and capillary pressure of foam in two 1-meter-long model fractures. Both model fractures are made of glass plates. They have different roughness and hydraulic apertures. Unlike microfluidics with uniform depth of etching, our model fractures each has a variation of aperture. We characterize the roughness and represent the aperture distribution of the fracture as a network of pore bodies and pore throats. In this study, foam is pre-generated and then injected into the fractures. The inlet and outlet valves are closed for 24 hr after foam reaches steady-state. We use a high-speed camera to visualize foam in the fractures. We use ImageJ software to analyze foam texture and quantify bubble density, average bubble size and polydispersivity. In addition, we estimate water saturation and capillary pressure by analyzing images in terms of fracture geometry. We found that water in foam resides in locations of narrow aperture, Plateau borders, lamellae between bubbles, and water films on glass walls. Water-filled zones of narrow aperture and Plateau borders account for almost all the water. During the re-distribution of water and gas in static foam, in-flow and out-flow of water must take paths along the network of Plateau borders and water-occupied zones, as they are the only continuous paths for water flow. In both model fractures, the decrease in water saturation coincides with an increase in capillary pressure, as expected. This novel technique of estimation of water saturation and capillary pressure of foam provides insights for studies of foam in naturally fractured reservoirs with complex geometry, where measuring such foam properties is challenging. This analysis is possible because aperture varies along our model fractures, unlike most microfluidic devices. Our technique would also have an application to foam aquifer remediation and CO 2 sequestration.