In spite of trying to understand processes in the same spatial domain, the catchment hydrology and water quality scientific communities are relatively disconnected and so are their respective models. This is emphasized by an inadequate representation of transport processes, in both catchment-scale hydrological and water quality models. While many hydrological models at the catchment scale only account for pressure propagation and not for mass transfer, catchment scale water quality models are typically limited by overly simplistic representations of flow processes. With the objective of raising awareness for this issue and outlining potential ways forward we provide a nontechnical overview of (1) the importance of hydrology-controlled transport through catchment systems as the link between hydrology and water quality; (2) the limitations of current generation catchment-scale hydrological and water quality models; (3) the concept of transit times as tools to quantify transport; and (4) the benefits of transit time based formulations of solute transport for catchment-scale hydrological and water quality models. There is emerging evidence that an explicit formulation of transport processes, based on the concept of transit times has the potential to improve the understanding of the integrated system dynamics of catchments and to provide a stronger link between catchment-scale hydrological and water quality models.@en

Agriculture disturbs the biogeochemical cycles of major elements, which alters the elemental stoichiometry of surface stream waters, with potential impacts on their ecosystems. However, models of catchment hydrology and water quality remain relatively disconnected, even though the observation that dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrate (NO3−) have opposite spatial and temporal patterns seems relevant for improving our representation of hydrological transport pathways within catchments. We tested the ability of a parsimonious model to simultaneously reproduce intra-annual dynamics of stream flow, DOC and NO3− concentrations using 15 years of daily data from a small headwater agricultural catchment (AgrHyS observatory). The model consists of an unsaturated reservoir, a slow reservoir representing the groundwater and a fast reservoir representing the riparian zone and preferential flow paths. The sources of DOC and NO3− are assumed to behave as infinite pools with a fixed concentration in each reservoir that contributes to the stream. Stream concentrations thus result from simple mixing of slow and fast reservoir contributions. The model simultaneously reproduced annual and storm-event dynamics of discharge, DOC and NO3− concentrations in the stream, with calibration KGE scores of 0.77, 0.64 and 0.58 respectively, and validation KGE scores of 0.72, 0.58 and 0.43 respectively. These results suggest that the dynamics of these concentrations can be explained by hydrological transport processes and thus by temporally variable contributions from slow (NO3− rich and DOC poor) and fast reservoirs (DOC rich and NO3− poor), with a poor representation of the biogeochemical transformations. Unexpectedly, using the concentration time series to calibrate the model increased uncertainty in the parameters that control hydrological fluxes of the model. The legacy storage of NO3− resulting from agricultural history in the studied catchment supports the assumption that the main DOC and NO3− sources behave as infinite pools at the scale of several years. Nevertheless, reproducing the long-term trends in solute concentration would require additional information about DOC and NO3− trends within the reservoirs.@en