Predicting the areas of the source code having a higher likelihood to change in the future is a crucial activity to allow developers to plan preventive maintenance operations such as refactoring or peer-code reviews. In the past the research community was active in devising change prediction models based on structural metrics extracted from the source code. More recently, Elish et al. showed how evolution metrics can be more efficient for predicting change-prone classes. In this paper, we aim at making a further step ahead by investigating the role of different developer-related factors, which are able to capture the complexity of the development process under different perspectives, in the context of change prediction. We also compared such models with existing change-prediction models based on evolution and code metrics. Our findings reveal the capabilities of developer-based metrics in identifying classes of a software system more likely to be changed in the future. Moreover, we observed interesting complementarities among the experimented prediction models, that may possibly lead to the definition of new combined models exploiting developer-related factors as well as product and evolution metrics.@en

Modern version control systems, e.g., GitHub, include bug tracking mechanisms that developers can use to highlight the presence of bugs. This is done by means of bug reports, i.e., textual descriptions reporting the problem and the steps that led to a failure. In past and recent years, the research community deeply investigated methods for easing bug triage, that is, the process of assigning the fixing of a reported bug to the most qualified developer. Nevertheless, only a few studies have reported on how to support developers in the process of understanding the type of a reported bug, which is the first and most time-consuming step to perform before assigning a bug-fix operation. In this paper, we target this problem in two ways: first, we analyze 1280 bug reports of 119 popular projects belonging to three ecosystems such as MOZILLA, APACHE, and ECLIPSE, with the aim of building a taxonomy of the types of reported bugs; then, we devise and evaluate an automated classification model able to classify reported bugs according to the defined taxonomy. As a result, we found nine main common bug types over the considered systems. Moreover, our model achieves high F-Measure and AUC-ROC (64% and 74% on overall, respectively).@en

Code smells have always been associated with bad code source quality and maintenance problems by the research community. However, a few code smells remain within code for years without influence a project, and some of the developers do not even recognize them. This late-breaking idea paper wants to investigate the role of code smells within the context of software quality and the sustainability of projects. For this reason, we first plan to understand the impact of code smells on sustainability and then perform a fine-grain analysis to analyze their evolution, focusing on the possible benefits of their presence.@en

Continuous changes applied during software maintenance risk to deteriorate the structure of a system and are a threat to its maintainability. In this context, predicting the portions of source code where specific maintenance operations should be focused on may be crucial for developers to prevent maintainability issues. Previous work proposed change prediction models relying on product and process metrics as predictors of change-prone source code classes. However, we believe that existing approaches still miss an important piece of information, i.e., developer-related factors that are able to capture the complexity of the development process under different perspectives. In this paper, we firstly investigate three change prediction models that exploit developer-related factors (e.g., number of developers working on a class) as predictors of change-proneness of classes and then we compare them with existing models. Our findings reveal that these factors improve the capabilities of change prediction models. Moreover, we observed interesting complementarities among the prediction models. For this reason, we devised a novel change prediction model exploiting the combination of developer-related factors and product and evolution metrics. The results show that such a combined model is up to 22% more effective than the single models in the identification of change-prone classes.@en

Code smells are sub-optimal implementation choices applied by developers that have the effect of negatively impacting, among others, the change-proneness of the affected classes. Based on this consideration, in this paper we conjecture that code smell-related information can be effectively exploited to improve the performance of change prediction models, i.e., models having the goal of indicating which classes are more likely to change in the future. We exploit the so-called intensity index—a previously defined metric that captures the severity of a code smell—and evaluate its contribution when added as additional feature in the context of three state of the art change prediction models based on product, process, and developer-based features. We also compare the performance achieved by the proposed model with a model based on previously defined antipattern metrics, a set of indicators computed considering the history of code smells in files. Our results report that (i) the prediction performance of the intensity-including models is statistically better than the baselines and, (ii) the intensity is a better predictor than antipattern metrics. We observed some orthogonality between the set of change-prone and non-change-prone classes correctly classified by the models relying on intensity and antipattern metrics: for this reason, we also devise and evaluate a smell-aware combined change prediction model including product, process, developer-based, and smell-related features. We show that the F-Measure of this model is notably higher than other models.@en

The impact of developers' experience on several development practices has been widely investigated in the past. One of the most promising research fields is software testing, as many researchers found significant correlations between developers' experience and testing effectiveness. In this paper, we aim at further studying this relation, by focusing on how development teams' experience is associated with the assertion density, i.e., the number of assertions per test class KLOC, that has previously been shown as an effective way to decrease fault density. We perform a mixed-methods empirical study. First, we devise a statistical model relating development teams' experience and other control factors to the assertion density of test classes belonging to 12 software projects. This model enables us to investigate whether experience comes out as a statistically significant factor to explain assertion density. Second, we contrast the statistical findings with a survey study conducted with 57 developers, who were asked their opinions on how developer's experience is related to the way they add assertions in test code. Our findings suggest the existence of a relationship: On the one hand, the development team's experience is a statistically significant factor in most of the systems that we have investigated; on the other hand, developers confirm the importance of experience and team composition for the effective testing of production code.@en